My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Funding Strategies for Transportation System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/22/07 Work Session
>
Item B: Funding Strategies for Transportation System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:13:19 PM
Creation date
1/18/2007 9:17:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and preservation.Operating agreements have long been in place to provide efficient service delivery. <br />Examples of these operating partnerships include road maintenance agreements, ice and snow removal <br />agreements, and agreements on how other road-relatedservices such as leaf pickup and sweeping are <br />provided. The goals of these operating agreements, and similar agreements with Oregon Department of <br />Transportation, are to avoid redundant service and make the most efficient use of equipment in <br />geographical areas. An example would be the establishment of maintenance jurisdiction responsibilities <br />in River Road-Santa Clara for specific geographic areas. <br />Eugene has received transfer payments from the Lane County Road Fund since 1986. Originally, these <br />payments were related to the transfer of planning, building and park services as well as the transfer of <br />County roads within Eugene?s urban growth boundary to City jurisdiction. In 1993, the agreement was <br />modified in the form of the existing County/City Road Partnership Agreement. Transfer payments from <br />the Lane County Road Fund are deposited in Eugene?s Road Fund and are available for any legal Road <br />Fund purpose. In recent years, these funds have been used almost exclusively for operation, maintenance <br />and preservation. <br />Revenues received through the County/City Road Partnership Agreement have declined in recent years, <br />from a high of $2.7 million in FY96 to $1.25 million in FY01. The City in May 2001 signed a one-year <br />extension of the current $1.25 million agreement. Extension of the agreement beyond FY02 is uncertain, <br />complicatingthe City?s Road Fund financial projections and strategies. <br />Lane County recently learned it would receive an estimated $24 million in additional road funds over the <br />next six years through the federal Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000 and has <br />adopted criteria for distributing the additional funds through a new Capital Projects Partnership (CaPP) <br />fund.Modernization and safety projects are the highest priorities for the CaPP fund; however, <br />preservation projects may receive funding if other criteria are met. Over the next several months, Eugene <br />will review its transportation system needs and determine which projects should be submitted for <br />consideration for CaPP funding. <br />Eugene also has historically received special capital project funding from Lane County. An example is <br />the $5 million contribution Lane County made to the recently completed Ferry Street Bridge project. <br />Another example is the funding Lane County has provided for low-income housing projects through its <br />Roads for Assisted Housing Projects Program. These funds typically are project specific and are not a <br />likely source of funding for operation, maintenance and preservation. <br />Collaboration with City of Springfield <br />Throughout the course of the subcommittee process, staff from the cities of Eugene and Springfield have <br />made particular effort to maintain close communications and working relationships, both in preparation <br />of materials and testimony for the County Roads Advisory Committee and in sharing process and <br />backgroundmaterials related to our exploration of various transportation funding options. <br />On a somewhat parallel process to that of Eugene, the City of Springfield staff and council have also <br />been exploring the issue of transportation funding. When the subcommittee was beginning its work last <br />fall, Springfield staff indicated that, while their council had not as yet expressed strong interest in <br />creating new revenue sources, interest on the part of Eugene City Council or the County Commissioners <br />in doing so could make a difference in Springfield?s interest in exploring different revenue options. <br />Throughout its evaluation of various funding options, the subcommittee has continued to emphasize the <br />value of working jointly with Springfield towards regional implementation of a new revenue source to <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.