Laserfiche WebLink
Street Preservation <br />Preservation work includes rehabilitation and reconstruction activities. <br />Summary of discussion: <br />Many city streets are now showing significant signs of decay. Preserving Eugene?s current <br />investment in streets and related facilities is the most cost-effective investment of any new <br />transportationsystem funding and should receive the highestpriority. Timely investment in <br />preservation will extend useful life of existing streets for many years and prevent additional <br />deterioration. Failure to invest in rehabilitation would result in a need for much more expensive <br />reconstruction in the future. If rehabilitation activity is not done in a timely manner, the <br />subgrade will deteriorate, and failure will occur. When this failure occurs, the street structure <br />must be removed and reconstructed. The subcommittee agrees that funding rehabilitation first <br />will have the greatest cost-effectiveness. Reconstruction backlog projects should be funded after <br />the rehabilitation backlog is addressed. <br />Street Operation and Maintenance <br />The importance of continuing to fund transportation system operation <br />Summary of discussion: <br />and maintenance at the current level was supported by the subcommittee. Operation and <br />maintenanceservices are critical to the success of any capitalpreservation program. This is <br />particularly true if Eugene invests millions of dollars of new revenue in overcoming the <br />rehabilitation and reconstruction backlog.Without a fully funded Operation and maintenance <br />program,the preservation strategies will be less effective. <br />In recent years, the County has transferred $1.25 million of federal funds annually to the City <br />Road Fund. This money has gone to support operations and maintenance activities. If this <br />transfer is reduced or restricted to capital activities by the County, the Road Fund operations and <br />maintenance activities will be in a deficit position as early as FY03. The FY02 budget approved <br />by the Budget Committee presumes these funds will be available for a period of one year, based <br />on a one-year extension of the current County/CityRoad Partnership Agreement, signed in May <br />2001. <br />Off-Street Bicycle System Preservation Backlog <br /> Despite its popularity and Eugene?s commitment to multi-modal <br />Summary of discussion: <br />transportation, the off-street bicycle system has not been funded adequately because of the <br />constitutional constraints that do not allow use of road fund dollars outside of the road right-of- <br />way as well as the unavailability of City General Fund dollars. A priority for new, non- <br />constrained revenue from a transportation utility fee would address the rehabilitation and <br />reconstruction backlog of this deteriorating system. <br />Bicycle System Operation and Maintenance <br /> New revenue from a non-constrained source is needed for ongoing <br />Summary of discussion: <br />operation and maintenance of the bicycle system, which will be essential to preserveEugene?s <br />capital investment and ensure that bicycle transportation remains a viable transportation choice. <br />Traffic Calming and Other Needs <br />Although the subcommitteedid not rank other needs as highly as those <br />Summary of discussion: <br />addressed above, membersrecognized that traffic calming in particular is seen as an important <br />need by many people in the community. The consensus was that some level of federal STP <br />matching funds should be provided from any new revenue resource, and the matching and federal <br />14 <br />