My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Funding Strategies for Transportation System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/22/07 Work Session
>
Item B: Funding Strategies for Transportation System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:13:19 PM
Creation date
1/18/2007 9:17:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
down in FY08 when the youth levy expires and the library levy is reduced by half. The rate is expected to <br />go down again in FY11 when the urban renewal special levy to pay for the library bonds is eliminated. <br />There appears to be sufficient room under the cap to accommodate a capital local option levy with an <br />average tax rate of $0.75 per $1000 of real market value, leaving some room for property value <br />fluctuations during the levy term. This tax rate would generate capital spending of about $10 million per <br />year. Any room under the cap is shared between the City, County and Urban Renewal Agency, so there <br />would be less room for the City’s governmental partners or for the City to contemplate other local option <br />levy funding during the term of the pavement preservation capital local option levy. <br /> <br />Should council decide to include a property tax component in a pavement preservation funding package, <br />staff would recommend a capital local option levy over a GO bond as the preferred property tax funding <br />mechanism because a) the local option levy could provide sufficient funding under the Measure 5 tax rate <br />cap without incurring debt or using limited GO bonding capacity, and b) the local option levy is a less <br />expensive method than GO bonds for providing funding for pavement preservation projects. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.