My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Funding Strategies for Transportation System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/22/07 Work Session
>
Item B: Funding Strategies for Transportation System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:13:19 PM
Creation date
1/18/2007 9:17:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Option Levy <br />New or additional property taxes must be approved by a majority of the people voting in <br />Legal Authority <br />an election in November of an even-numbered year. In any other election, there must <br />and Restrictions <br />also be at least a 50% turnout of voters (the double-majority requirement of Measure <br />on Use <br />50). A 10-year capital local option levy can only be used for capital purposes. The <br />projects funded with a capital levy must have an average useful life of at least the term <br />of the levy (i.e., projects with a useful life of at least 10 years for a 10-year capital levy). <br />The tax is paid by all property owners within City limits. Property owners include <br />Incidence (who <br />business and residences. Businesses may choose to pass the tax on to their customers. <br />pays?) <br />The property tax is a proportional tax on the value of real and personal property for both <br />Fairness/Equity <br />businesses and residences. It does not take into account the ability of the taxpayer to <br />Issues <br />pay the tax. There are numerous exemptions from the property tax designed to promote <br />a variety of policy goals, including some designed to lessen the impact on low-income <br />owners and tenants. Projects with a useful life of more than 10 years would be paid for <br />by those taxpayers who live in the City only during the 10 year life of the levy, and <br />those citizens that use the facilities beyond the 10 year life of the levy would receive <br />those services with paying for them. <br />This tax would generate capital funding on a ?pay-as-you-go? basis, rather than <br />Assessment of <br />providing lump-sum funding on the front end of projects. The level of revenue <br />Financial <br />generated would be static during the term of the levy (assuming a uniform amount levy) <br />Stability and <br />or could increase or decrease each year depending on the change in assessed value of the <br />Political <br />City (assuming a tax rate levy). <br />Feasibility <br />The property tax is understandable to the voters (as opposed to a new form of user fee or <br />taxes), making it politically feasible from that standpoint. Local option levy proposals <br />have had mixed success in the Eugene area in recent years. There have been six local <br />option levy proposals on the ballot from Eugene or Lane County since Measure 47 <br />passed, and three of those have been successful. Council members have expressed <br />dissatisfaction with heavy reliance on property taxes in various forums in recent years. <br />This tax would increase the cost of owning a home or business, and potentially increase <br />Potential <br />the cost of leasing or renting a home or business, if the property owner passes on the tax <br />Economic <br />increase. <br />Impacts <br />Council has several financial policies stating that, to the extent possible, non-recurring <br />Consistency with <br />resources, such as a local option levy, should be used for non-recurring expenses, such <br />Council Goals <br />as capital projects. <br />and Policies <br />Council goals include a desire to foster affordable housing. An additional property tax <br />levy would be contrary to that goal, as it would raise the cost of housing. <br />Prior to the passage of Measure 50, several jurisdictions funded transportation projects <br />Other <br />with a serial levy. Under the ?black box? calculation of Measure 50 permanent tax <br />Jurisdiction <br />rates, most of those serial levies were incorporated into those jurisdictions? permanent <br />Experiences <br />tax rates. Since implementation of Measure 50, there do not appear to be any local <br />governments that have used local option levies for transportation funding projects. <br />I8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.