Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'e. Greater urban public transit efficiency by providing a higher level of service for a <br />given investment in transit equipment and the like. <br /> <br />3. The 'disadvantages ofa too-compact UGB can be a disproportionately greater increase in <br />the value of vacant land within the E:ugene-Springfield area, which would contribute to <br />higher housing prices. Factors other than size and location of the UGB and city limits <br />affect land and housing costs. These include site characteristics, interest rates, state and <br />federal tax laws, existing public service availability, and future public facility costs. <br /> <br />4. Periodic evaluation of land use' needs compared to land supply provides a basis for <br />orderly and non-excessive conversion of rural land to urbanizable land and provides a <br />basis for public action to adjust the supply upward in response to the rate of consumption. <br /> <br />5. Prior to the late 1960s, Eugene and Springfield had no growth management policy and, <br />therefore, growth patterns were generally dictated by natural physical characteristics. <br /> <br />6. Mandatory statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development <br />Commission (LCDC) require that all communities in the state establish VOBs to identify <br />and separate urbanizable land from rnralland. <br /> <br />7. Between 1970 and 1983, Springfield's population increased about 4 percent and <br />Eugene's about 2.5 percent a year, but unincorporated 'portions of the metropolitan area <br />experienced a population decline. About 17 percent of the total increase in the <br />population was related to annexations. This indicates that growth is occurring in cities, <br />which is consistent with the compact urban growth concept, and limitations on urban' <br />scatteration into unincorporated areas, as first embodied in the 1990 Plan. <br /> <br />8. In addition to Finding 7 above, evidence that the UGB is an effective growth <br />management tool includes the following: <br /> <br />ao Consistent reduction over time of vacant land within the DGB. <br /> <br />b. Reductio11 of vacant residential zoned land in Springfield and Eugene. <br /> <br />c. Greater value of vacant land within Springfield and Eugene than similar land <br />outside incorporated areas but within the UGB . <br /> <br />d. Increase since 1970 of the proportionate share .ofresidential building permits <br />issued within city limits. <br /> <br />9. Reduction in the use of zoning provisions and regulatory processes that favor single- <br />family detached dwellings on standard size parcels would increase the opportunity to <br />realize higher net residential densities than are presently occurring, particularly in newly <br />developing areas. <br /> <br />II-C-2 <br />