Laserfiche WebLink
<br />standards, as interpreted by the city, as well as the conceptual plan <br />approved under subsection a above. <br /> <br />27. Any lot under five acres in size. to be created in an urbanizable area will require utilizing <br />the following additional standards: <br /> <br />8. The property will be owned by a governmental agency or public utility. <br /> <br />b. A majority of parcels located within 100 feet of the property are smaller than five <br />acres. <br /> <br />c. No more than three parcels are being created. <br /> <br />28. The siting of all residences on urbanizable lots served by on.-site sewage disposal systems <br />shall be reviewed by Lane County to ensure the efficient future conversion of these lots <br />to urban densities according to Metro Plan assumptions and minimum density <br />requirements. <br /> <br />29. . The approval of on-site sewage disposal systems for rural and urbanizable area uses and <br />developments shall be the responsibility of Lane County, subject to: (a) applicable state <br />law; (b) the criteria for the creation of new lots in Policies 26, 27 above; ( c) the <br />requirement for the siting of residences in Policy 28 above; (d) requirements of Policy 30; <br />and (e) the requirements for special heavy industrial designated areas. <br /> <br />30. In order to encourage economic diversification, on-site sewage disposal systems shall be <br />allowed for industrial development and for commercial development allowed within <br />Campus Industrial designated areas in conjunction with annexation to a city, when <br />. extension of the public wastewater system. is imminent or is identified as part of an <br />approved capital improvement. program. <br /> <br />31<< Eugene, . Springfield, and Lane County shall continue to involve affected local <br />govemmentsand other urban service providers in development of future, applicable <br />Metro Plan revisions, including amendments and updates. <br /> <br />32. If expansion of the UGB is contemplated, all other options should be considered . and <br />eliminated before consideration of expanding the UGB in the area west of Highway 99 <br />and north of Royal Avenue. <br /> <br />Note: For other related policy discussion, see the Public Facilities and Services Element in <br />Chapter III-G. <br /> <br />II-C-8 <br />