My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: River Road/Santa Clara Annexation Policy
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/24/07 Work Session
>
Item B: River Road/Santa Clara Annexation Policy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:16:12 PM
Creation date
1/18/2007 4:15:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />F. River Road and Santa Clara Goals, Findings, Objectives, and <br />Policies <br /> <br />The River Road and Santa Clara portions of the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area are <br />important components of the metropolitan 'community. Both River Road and Santa Clara have: <br /> <br />· Unique and distinctive neighborhood identities <br />· Experienced considerable private investment in the past years <br />· Experienced considerable public investments; e.g., transmi.ssionfacilities by the <br />Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) and educational facilities by public school <br />systems <br />. A sound housing stocK <br /> <br />In Santa Clara, relatively large parcels of vacant land exist which, with adequate urban services, <br />can be developed at increased densities; in River Roa~, relatively large developed lots exist <br />which could be further developed by their owners. <br /> <br />The future of both the River Road and Santa Clara areas will play a critical role in the growth of <br />the metropolitan area. For some. years, officials of Lane County and Eugene have cooperatively <br />discussed methods of delivering services to these neighborhoods. <br /> <br />These discussions have continually focused on two sides of a single, critical issue: <br /> <br />How can the short-ran.ge costs and benefits to the residents and other service providers be <br />balanced against, and what are the long-range costs and benefits to the residents and the <br />entire metropolitan area of logical growth and increased, densities? <br /> <br />Inflation has drastically increased.the need to balance these two potentially divergent objectives. <br />The effects of continued inflation can be mitigated by identifying and implementing a sol~tion to <br />the servicing issue. <br /> <br />A unique set of circumstances has occurred which lends direction to resolution of the service <br />delivery questions for both River Road and Santa . Clara. <br /> <br />1.. As part of the acknowledgement process for tbe Metro Plan, the Land Conservation and <br />Development Commission (LCDC) directed that a servicing plan be developed for both <br />River Road and Santa Clara and that Eugene provide those services. <br /> <br />2. Discussions between Eugene officials and state and county t~presentatives of the River <br />Road and Santa Clara area have led to reconsideration of Eugene's policy to provide <br />services to these neighborhoods only after annexation to the City of Eugene of both areas <br />has occurred. <br /> <br />3.. Preliminary review of Eugene's comprehensive capital improvement program suggested <br />a. full range of services could not be provided immediately even if the areas were atmexed <br />at one time'.. <br /> <br />II-F-l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.