Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To date, we are unaware of a city policy that requires only city <br />streets provide access and utilities to properties within the city <br />limits. Indeed, current infill development in our area uses private <br />roads to access new subdivisions. In light of this, the answer to the <br />FAQ below seems inconsistent with current city practices. In <br />addition, the statement below regarding city streets providing <br />access to properties within the city limits addresses only part of the <br />issue. These same streets provide access and utilities for county <br />residents. City limits are the property line of each annexed parcel, <br />not the entire neighborhood into which a property gets annexed. <br /> <br />6. Why does the City look for logical and appropriate street segments to <br />annex? <br />Since the Metro Plan says that all lands inside the Eugene Urban Growth Boundary <br />will probably some day be part of the city, it makes sense to have city streets <br />provide access and utilities to properties within the city limits. Having streets <br />within the city limits allows the city greater control over water and sewer line <br />extension and repair, addition of bicycle lane and sidewalks, traffic speed control, <br />and traffic enforcement. <br /> <br />The current practice of superfluous street annexation (the <br />annexation of streets not directly adjacent to the property being <br />annexed) seems to be a clear case of the cart before the horse. The <br />city of Eugene is not provid>ing services to the majority of residents <br />out here, yet seems .to be attempting to control service provision <br />and possibly future governance through street annexatio<n. <br />Although the city residents in Santa Clara do deserve city services, <br />it is not at all clear that the street annexation policies improve the <br />services they receive. The advantages to the city residents in Santa <br />Clara presently do not outweigh the potential disadvantages to the <br />non-city residents. <br />We need to consider all of the residents of our community as we <br />plan for the future. We hope the city of Eugene will work with us in <br />a positive and collaborative way on community visioning and <br />planning. When the city of Eugene and the residents of this area <br />reach an a.greement about the why, how and/or when of <br />annexation, that would be the time to consider wholesale street <br />annexation. Until such time, we req.uest that the current practice of <br />superfluous street annexation cease. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />The board of the SCCO <br />