My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: River Road/Santa Clara Annexation Policy
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/24/07 Work Session
>
Item B: River Road/Santa Clara Annexation Policy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:16:12 PM
Creation date
1/18/2007 4:15:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />service districts, or creation of a new City) are not ruled out by the Metro Plan (II-C-5 <br />and 6, policies 15, 19 and 20; pg. II-F-5, policy 6). For now, a large majority of River <br />Road residents receive a satisfactory level of urban services from Lane County and <br />perfectly functional independent service districts. City staff acknowledge that most of <br />the problems associated with piecemeal annexation have been solved satisfactorily at <br />this time: "contractual arrangements among service providers smooth out the <br />irregularities caused by the incremental annexation process" [Boundary Commission <br />staff notes, April 6, 2006 meeting]. <br /> <br />Instead, street annexations are depriving "islanded" residents of a right they would <br />otherwise retain--the right to vote on any future annexation--and alarming other <br />residents that they will lose this right soon. <br /> <br />Many residents of unincorporated areas are reacting with hostility to what they view as <br />aggressive and hostile action by the City. This is unfortunate at a time when RRCO is <br />hoping to embark on a community visioning and planning process and a more positive <br />dialog about annexation and transition options. <br /> <br />We urge the City Council to establish a City policy and direct the City Manager to cease <br />the practice of extended street annexations and creation of "islands" of unincorporated <br />residents. Residents of unincorporated River Road, still a significant majority of <br />residents in our area, deserve to be able to vote before being annexed to the City and <br />having their existing and functional independent service districts dissolved. Just <br />because the City does not forcibly annex such islands immediately is not the issue. <br />Residents DO experience a change in legal status when they are "islanded", as <br />acknowledged in the City's FAQ Annexation in Eugene (March 2006). <br /> <br />The ongoing dialog with the City about the services and standards that are appropriate <br />for our area (stormwater services, road maintenance and street design standards, infill <br />standards, etc.) should be allowed to continue without the overlay of hostility in reaction <br />to aggressive action by the City that reduces the legal rights and options of area <br />residents. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />RRCO Board members Becky Riley, Rob Handy, Mara Wile, Kate Kelly, Teresa <br />Damron, Marilyn Mohr, Jan Spencer, Eileen Nittler <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />cc: Eugene City Manager Dennis Taylor, Assistant City Manager Jim Carlson, Paula <br />Taylor (for Boundary Commission) <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.