My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: River Road/Santa Clara Annexation Policy
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 01/24/07 Work Session
>
Item B: River Road/Santa Clara Annexation Policy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:16:12 PM
Creation date
1/18/2007 4:15:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RRCO attachment to 8/01/06 letter re: street annexations—page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Besides a single light on Maxwell, River Road is the only street in our neighborhood with traffic <br />signals, and thus where coordination of signals is an issue. Since River Road and Maxwell are <br />already under City jurisdiction, we do not see how annexation of segments of other streets will <br />have any effect on coordination of traffic signals. <br /> <br />Stormwater and sewer line extension and repair <br /> <br />City staff say [March 30, 2006 Memo from Jim Carlson to Mayor and Council on Street <br />Annexations]: "Stormwater needs to be managed as a functioning system. The City's stormwater <br />system is more comprehensive (than Lane County's). The City is better equipped to handle <br />stormwater issues through its stormwater utility system." They also say street annexations allow <br />the City greater control over sewer line extension and repair [City of Eugene's FAQ Annexations in <br />Eugene (March 2006)]. <br /> <br />In fact, there is very little City stormwater infrastructure system (e.g., storm sewer pipes) in the River <br />Road neighborhood. Instead, the stormwater system is a dispersed one, based on drywells, ditches, <br />and natural infiltration through soils--unconnected to the city's "comprehensive" system. Many <br />residents want to retain this "country-style" drainage and avoid connection to the City's piped system <br />to preserve neighborhood character. Dispersed systems are also coming into favor with our <br />environmental agencies due to their ability to reduce runoff and pollution of our surface waters. It <br />would be very costly to area residents and all City taxpayers to replace this dispersed system with a <br />system of pipes and curbs and gutters. As the City acknowledges, Lane County and the City are <br />cooperating under an intergovernmental agreement to develop a stormwater Basin Plan for River <br />Road-Santa Clara--as with other services and governmental functions, management of stormwater is <br />being handled adequately under current agreements between the City and County. Personnel from <br />both jurisdictions have indicated an intent to retain the dispersed stormwater system in our area to <br />the extent possible. Thus, it is not at all obvious that the City is "better equipped" to take control of <br />stormwater management here, since it is handled very differently than in the rest of the City (and <br />more like the way it is handled elsewhere in the County). <br /> <br />The City already operates and maintains the wastewater system throughout River Road, via the <br />Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission created by intergovernmental agreement <br />between Eugene, Springfield and Lane County. According to the River Road-Santa Clara Fiscal <br />Analysis (Oct. 2004) by EcoNorthwest, "Complete annexation of River Road and Santa Clara <br />would have no impact on the delivery of wastewater services as the City of Eugene currently <br />collects and treats wastewater from the entire area." We have seen no evidence that extension <br />and repair of sewer lines is a problem that has not been handled under current agreements. <br /> <br />Water Service and Water Line Extension and Repair <br /> <br />The City wants greater control over water line extension and repair, saying the two existing <br />independent water districts are reluctant to approve repairs done by EWEB. [March 30, 2006 <br />Memo from Jim Carlson to Mayor and Council on Street Annexations]. However, as far as we <br />know, the River Road water district is providing an adequate level of services to the unincorporated <br />residents who have elected to create and sustain it. It is neither necessary nor appropriate for the <br />City to take over water services or take ownership of the water pipes owned by the independent <br />water district without the agreement of the residents who have formed the district. If the City has <br />problems with the current arrangement, these could be solved via a re-negotiated agreement with <br />the water district about compensation for use of the district's water lines and access to those lines <br />for maintenance work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.