Laserfiche WebLink
Eugene City Council Retreat Report <br />January 2007 <br /> <br /> <br />Assessing Performance/Status of Existing Priorities <br /> <br />Neighborhood Association Initiative <br /> <br />A brief status report was provided by Kurt Corey. The Council provided the following <br />feedback: <br /> <br />+ ? ? <br />??? <br /> Positive feedback from Lost focus of initial Role and legitimacy of <br />neighborhood leaders initiative NLC? <br />?? <br />and association <br /> Broadened scope of Does the title need to <br />members <br />original ideas change or be broken <br />? <br />? <br /> Work has been good into two items <br /> No longer understand <br />and work plan reflects (Neighborhoods and <br />the initiative <br />overall Council direction Neighborhood <br />? <br /> Original idea was very <br />Associations)? <br />focused and specific <br /> <br /> Police pedestrian <br />o <br />patrol in urban core <br />parks <br /> Reducing conversion <br />o <br />in urban core from <br />residential to <br />commercial <br /> Preserve <br />o <br />neighborhood <br />integrity by <br />regulating infill <br /> <br /> <br />Complete Design Phase of City Hall Complex <br /> <br />A brief status report was provided by Jim Carlson. The Council provided the following <br />feedback: <br /> <br />+ ? ? <br />?? <br /> <br /> Consultant team has Time sensitive demands <br />been excellent at every on council are a <br />step struggle with this <br />? <br />consultant <br /> Getting what we are <br />? <br />paying for Outreach could be <br />? <br />broader for price being <br /> Subjective process has <br />paid <br />been well managed <br />? <br />? <br /> City could have <br /> Public involvement <br />explained breadth of <br />process outstanding – <br />process so people <br />meaningful <br />would better understand <br />? <br /> Outreach – focus on <br />why it was so expensive <br />getting input from a <br />variety of settings <br /> <br />Management Partners, Inc. 3 <br /> <br />