Laserfiche WebLink
Council Discussion: <br />• Councilor Syrett - said this motion addresses the burden on low-wage employees and <br />she would not support exempting all employees making less than $25 an hour; said that <br />this is a small amount of money to contribute to ensure that when 911 is called, <br />someone will respond. <br />• Councilor Clark- asked if non -profits are included in paying the tax; said his challenge <br />with this amendment is that it gets less broad-based, which was supposed to be the <br />rational for a payroll tax. <br />• Councilor Zelenka - wanted to make sure he understood the amendment's different <br />tiers for employees and that the employer rate would stay the same. <br />• Councilor Semple - expressed support for this amended motion because it responds to <br />community concerns about lowest -paid workers. <br />• Councilor Taylor - asked for more information about how the rates would translate to <br />dollars; said she will vote against this motion because, while it is an improvement, it is <br />not enough. <br />VOTE ON MOTION TO AMEND: PASSED 6:2, Councilors Taylor and Clark opposed. <br />MOTION TO AMEND: Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to <br />1. Amend subsection (1) of section 3.724 to increase the overall employer tax rate <br />from 0.0020 to 0.0021 <br />2. Add anew subsection (2) to section 3.724that states: 'Notwithstanding <br />subsection (1) of this section, the tax rate imposed on the first $100,000 of wages <br />paid by an employer with two or less employees is 0.0015" <br />3. Renumber subsections (2) through (6) of section 2.724 as subsections (3) through <br />(7). and <br />4. Update the cross references in subsections (4), (5) and (7) of section 3.724 and in <br />section 3.726. <br />Council Discussion: <br />• Councilor Zelenka - talked about his motion and his intention to address community <br />concerns about sole proprietors by giving them a discount but not an exemption. <br />• Councilor Taylor - shared concerns about employers not giving people raises because <br />they will have to then pay more in taxes. <br />• Councilor Clark- said that while he understood what this amendment is trying to <br />accomplish, it may not work out the way it's intended. <br />• Councilor Syrett -said she doesn't think there's a perfect way to get at the issue, but <br />would prefer this approach exempting for the first $100,000 for businesses with one or <br />two people versus exempting non -profits; expressed support for the amendment even if <br />it may not get all of the relief intended. <br />• Councilor Yeh - asked Councilor Zelenka to explain his rationale behind the amendment <br />and why a sole proprietor making $100,000 would need a break <br />• Councilor Zelenka - asked staff for the number of one- or two -person business within <br />Eugene; explained that the amendment would give a break to sole proprietors making <br />less than $100,000. <br />• Councilor Clark- asked if "S" corporations pay both the employer and employee rate; <br />asked about other situations where employers do business in Eugene but are not <br />located in the city. <br />MINUTES - Eugene City Council June 10, 2019 Page 4 <br />Work Session <br />