Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A <br />City Manager's Findings <br />in Consideration of Written Submissions <br />During the 23-day comment period,the City received 22 comments from 1 8 people regarding the <br />proposed Downtown Activity Zone Administrative Rule R-4.872 ("proposed Rule").A summary <br />of the comments received,and findings addressing the comments,are set out below: <br />1.Comments opposing the proposed Rule because requiring a clear eight-foot wide <br />travel lane for pedestrian use unfairly impacts the unhoused and unnecessarily <br />restricts the use of public space. <br />Findings:Currently,Eugene Code (EC)4.872(l)(b)provides:"Except when approved as <br />part of an authorized activity,the following acts are prohibited in the public pedestrian <br />areas within the downtown activity zone:...(b)Impeding access to any public pedestrian <br />area or to any public or private building adjacent to the public pedestrian area."EC 4.871 <br />defines "public pedestrian area"as:"Any public sidewalk,alley,plaza,and park,excluding <br />public areas under the primary control of entities other than the city.It also includes public <br />streets during the time streets are closed to vehicular traffic for a city-sponsored or <br />permitted event."EC 4.871 defines "impede"to mean:"To prevent progress or movement, <br />or to engage in an activity that would deter a reasonable person from progressing or moving <br />in the area of the activity." <br />While EC 4.872(l)(b)and the definition of "public pedestrian area"clearly prohibit <br />someone within the downtown activity zone (DAZ)from impeding a sidewalk,what <br />constitutes "impeding"a sidewalk,and,therefore a violation of EC 4.872(l)(b),needs <br />clarification.Without greater specificity around the meaning of "impede,"the ability to <br />both comply with and enforce EC 4.872(l)(b)is difficult.The proposed Rule clarifies that, <br />for purposes of EC 4.872(l)(b),impeding means providing less than an eight-foot wide <br />travel lane clear for pedestrian use. <br />EC 4.870 describes the purpose of the DAZ,stating,in part:"This area is intended to <br />encourage private investment in the downtown area and to enhance the value of such <br />investments by encouraging pedestrians to come to the area."An eight-foot pedestrian <br />travel lane furthers the Council-stated intent of encouraging pedestrian users within the <br />DAZ.A wider travel lane enables two-way,free-flowing pedestrian traffic,including two- <br />way traffic of individuals using mobility devices. <br />Impacts of the proposed Rule can be mitigated through educating the public on permissible <br />locations to relocate and in delaying enforcement of the proposed Rule to provide <br />additional time to increase the number of these permissible locations.As a result of these <br />comments,there will be 6-month education period during which time no citations will be <br />issued for violating EC 4.872(l)(b)except in extreme,repeat offender situations. <br />Exhibit A to Administrative Order 56-19-01-F -Page 1 of 4