My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ordinance Concerning Jefferson/Far West Plan Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 02/20/07 Public Hearing
>
Item 3: Ordinance Concerning Jefferson/Far West Plan Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:44:04 PM
Creation date
2/15/2007 8:25:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />HARDING Terri L <br /> <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Katherine Boyd [kboyd@uoregon,edu] <br />SaturdaYf November 181 20066:35 PM <br />HARDING Terri L <br />Residentia'lZoning Change <br /> <br />Dear Terri Harding, <br /> <br />I am writing because I recently received a letter describing the request to change the <br />ttArea I5H neighborhood from medium density <br />residential to low density residential. As a Eugene native and a <br />student learning more about land-use planning, lam saddened that the City Council <br />initiated this 'application. <br /> <br />As David Hinkley wrote in a recent Eugene Weekly article, our city is developing a Hhollow <br />core" with less density at the center and more toward the peripheral areas. This <br />migration away from the central area has led to tl1e dismal state of downtown Eugene, an <br />area which the city has been trying to re-invigorate for years. How is it that, after <br />countless ideas for how to revitalize downtown, as \-\l'ell as pouring millions of dollars <br />into this effort, the City Council has decided to back a reduction of housing density in <br />an areas directly adjacent to downtown Eugene? Perhaps they were thinking that because <br />none bf the efforts have succeeded so far, the best choice would be to rip out the feeding <br />tubes and let it die. Putting a cap on the amount of density allowed in a neighborhood so <br />int~grated with downtown robs us of the opportunity to create well designed, beautiful <br />housing that is within walking distance of local <br />businesses, the library, and public transit. Instead of <br />encouraging smart growth, we are catering to the wishes of a few short-sighted <br />individuals. SiTnultaneously, this zoning change will encourage development toward the <br />fringes of the city, putting pressure on the urban growth boundary. <br /> <br />Instead of looking for ways to mo\re denser housing out of our backyards, we should be <br />looking for ways that it can, satisfy our ideas about: \tv-hat a neighborhood should accomplish <br />socially, aestheticall)l, and environmentally. There are 111..1merOUS precedents that <br />illustrate hO\-\1more density can increase the vitality of a neighborhood if it is done <br />well. <br /> <br />Bottom Line; Eugene is growing. A dense core. means a cit)r with <br />thriving local businesses that is less dependent on automobiles. <br />Grovvth toward the perimeter facilitates urban sprawl. The choice 'Are make about Area 15 is <br />a choice between the two. <br /> <br />Thank you for your time, <br />Katie Boyd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.