My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodologies and Rates
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 02/20/07 Public Hearing
>
Item 5: Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodologies and Rates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:11 PM
Creation date
2/15/2007 8:30:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. APPENDIX B <br /> <br />Capacity Parameter Allocation Basis <br /> <br />System Capacity,Parameters.arebased on permitting requirements. Facility process <br />components (defined in Appendix A) are allocated to' each of the system capacity <br />parameters, as described below. <br /> <br />CollecUon System Pipelines <br /> <br />This category consists of major gravity sewer pipelines and force mains (pressure ~es) that <br />convey flow for the regional wastewater collection systeIlL Since the primary function af the <br />pipelines is to convey flow, the allocation is assigned to either average ~r peak flow and <br />none to wastewater strengt!l parameters (i.e., BOD and TSS). The majority of the time the <br />conveyance system is carrying average flows. However, the limiting design criteria when <br />sizing pipelines is based on peak flows. <br /> <br />An assessment of the wet season 1/1, which is the key driver in determining the peak flows, <br />can be 'used as a guide in determining the average/peak allocation bre*down.Table B-1 . <br />presents the wet season 1/1 as a percentage of total peak flow for existing capacity, cUrrent <br />loading, and future required capacity. <br /> <br />TABLE B-1 <br />Design Criteria Basis For Unit Pr~sses Driven By Peak Flow <br /> <br />Existing capacity <br /> <br />Current loading (current <br />capacity required) <br /> <br />Projected 2025 loading <br />(future capacity required) <br /> <br />Notes: <br />a) Net reduction in. total III occurs between now and 2025 as ,a result of III reduction efforts by th.e cities. <br /> <br />Average Wet Weather 111 as a <br />Flow Wet Weather III Total Peak Flow Percentage of Total Peak <br />(mgd) (mgd) (mgd) PI'ow, .% <br />49 126 175 720/0 <br />43.8 220.2 264 83% <br />59.3 218.78 277 79% <br /> <br />The range of wet weather III as a percentage of total pe.ak flow for these three scenarios <br />ranges from 72 to 84 percent. The arithmetic average of these three values is 78 percent. <br />Therefore, a reasonable approach is to allocate a quarter to functional use basis, or average <br />flow; and three quarters to the design criteria sizing basis, or peak flow. <br /> <br />. Average Flow - 1/4 <br />. Peak Flow - 3/.4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.