<br />TABLE 1
<br />Summary of'Key Methodological Requirements
<br />
<br />Oregon Law Requirement
<br />
<br />Methodology demonstrates consideration of the
<br />need for increased capacity in the system to meet .
<br />future users' demands
<br />
<br />. Combined Fee
<br />
<br />Demonstrate that charge is not based on
<br />providing the same capacity
<br />
<br />MWMC Methodology
<br />
<br />Allocates future improvement costs to growth in proportion to
<br />capacity requirements
<br />
<br />Determines total growth capacity. requirements and the portion
<br />of capa'city to be met through. existing system available
<br />capaCitY and Mure capacity expansion. Calculates a weighted
<br />average cost of capacity.
<br />
<br />System Development Charge Methodology
<br />
<br />.Overview
<br />
<br />The SDC methodology for MWMC i$ based on a combined reimbursement and
<br />improvement structure, as shown in Figure 1. The methodology consists of the followirig
<br />elements: .
<br />
<br />. Determine capacity needs
<br />. Develop cost basis
<br />. Develop SDC schedule
<br />. Calculate revenue offsets and credits
<br />
<br />FIGURE 1-oVERVIEW OF MWMC SDC METHODOLOGY
<br />
<br />
<br />New facilities
<br />
<br />r_;~B~~~;;;Y:' x,: y~"",~ ~:' ,~~~ ,',,~<^ ~/.'(~:^,;,,'~v, ";~<,~(,, >>~J:+' ',>:~tllII_I~>>~~i';W~~~~v ,'~~: N>/.~;,,~~
<br />Jt~ti' :;;,>~Pfr:i'~ "~ x". '" , ' A /:> < D) ..), f I. ~ '1 f ~ 1 ~ ," ~1 I$: }. ~'\ l ~ ~> ~ "'{ "'~~4t~ ~,,~ '%' )w>>, ~" $ " ;K~'l.'~"'>.
<br />~Yfr*~%M~;@~tI}I~~~(:\~:{~;; ~,,' ,~t~:.:=;w; , ,'^'< ',:;C .~~~,~;, ~^~ ~,,',.(. :,1;, , .:, . ~ " ;':N' ^ '~'d~':0Mhrlr*,,;, ii;ffit@~}.,~~itd ", 'v :~:v v ,'" ,:', (:~i:~
<br />
<br />
<br />L j . :
<br />Existing . . . '.~
<br />Capdy ($) n... ............;.. ..~~.~J~L.... ........ ....... J
<br />~ . GfOYJIh units (Avg. Flow, Peak Flow, BOD, TSS) ~
<br />
<br />......... ... ... ................. ... ........ .... ........ ..... ...... ..... ......... .............
<br />
|