My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Traffic Safety Issues
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 02/21/07 Work Session
>
Item A: Traffic Safety Issues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:10:24 PM
Creation date
2/15/2007 8:42:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/21/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: Traffic Safety Options <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: February 21, 2007 Agenda Item Number: A <br />Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Tom Larsen <br /> <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-4959 <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor has requested a work session focused on evaluating the traffic safety options available <br />to the City to reduce red light crashes. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />In the mid- to late-1990s, many U.S. cities, including Eugene, saw a dramatic rise in the incidence and <br />frequency of red light running. The most common explanations for this increase are incidental resulting <br />from driver inattention or distraction, and deliberate resulting from driver frustration with increased <br />traffic volumes and congestion making it more urgent to get through signalized intersections. The risk of <br />a long delay at a signal vs. the small risk of being cited or in a crash may lead many drivers to believe it <br />is to their benefit to run the red indication. In Eugene, Public Works and Police Department staff <br />perform to national standards regarding traffic signal operation and enforcement of existing traffic laws. <br /> <br />City Council History <br />The City Council 2001-2002 Goals included an item for red light running cameras. The staff response is <br />contained in Attachments A and B, the December 5, 2002, memorandum to the council. <br /> <br />The May 11, 2005, memorandum to the City Council, Attachment C, followed up on the question of the <br />AIRS upgrade and the status of other red light running programs in Oregon. <br /> <br />The October 16, 2006, memorandum to the council, Attachment D, provides more details on the reports <br />from other Oregon cities with successful red light running camera programs. <br /> <br />In response to the 2002 staff report, the Police Commission and Budget Committee adopted several <br />strategies including additional Traffic Enforcement Unit personnel and targeted enforcement. <br /> <br />Eugene Red Light Running Crashes <br />Specific statistics on red light running and related crashes are difficult to compile and compare. The <br />Federal Highway Administration (FHA) Highway Safety Information System estimates that 260,000 red <br />light running crashes occur annually, representing between 16% and 20% of crashes at intersections. <br />Oregon law requires reporting of crashes and the resulting state data base lists several causes for <br />reported crashes including “Disregard of a traffic signal.” Red light running is not specifically tracked <br />in the Oregon crash reporting system. Table 1 compares the five-year history of crashes in eight Oregon <br />cities where “Disregard of the traffic signal” was listed on the crash report as a cause of the crash. Cities <br />are listed in ascending order of rate of disregard crashes per 1000 population. <br /> L:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M070221\S070221A.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.