Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT D <br />In 2002 a staff team evaluated red light photo-enforcement. The staff report from that process is <br />attached. The cost of the enforcement camera system, associated administrative and court costs <br />of citation processing and uncertainty about public acceptance contributed to the <br />recommendation to delay implementation of a red light running camera program. The biennial <br />review process has been completed and highlights of the cost and public acceptance reported for <br />Portland, Medford and Beaverton are given above. The May 11, 2005 update on Photo red light <br />cameras is also attached. Staff continues to recommend delay in red light camera implementation <br />until after the AIRS upgrade anticipated in FY08. <br /> <br /> <br />ALL RED PHASING <br /> <br />All red phasing is often used in wider intersections to allow additional clearance time. The added <br />red time also gives red light violators extra time to cross the intersection safely. The most recent <br />studies show an all red phase of 1.5 to 2 seconds does reduce the number of crashes associated <br />with red light violations. A limited number of Eugene intersections already have one or two <br />seconds of all red. We have not implemented all red as a standard practice. The difficulty with all <br />red phasing is the associated increase in congestion and reduction of capacity at congested <br />intersections. For most of our simple downtown two phase (north-south and east-west) <br />intersections adding 1.5 seconds of all red will reduce the green time by just over 4%. For the <br />fixed time signal network downtown, all red phasing would show little benefit and increase <br />congestion. <br /> <br />At more complicated intersections with left turns or separated phasing the capacity reduction will <br />be greater. During rush hour we have capacity and congestion problems in several corridors. All <br />red phasing will make these problems worse. At signals that have vehicle detection, outside of <br />peak hours, the increase in congestion will not present a capacity issue. Traffic Operations staff <br />are currently analyzing several intersections and will continue to add all red phasing when <br />intersection geometry, crash history, length of intersection crossing and impact on traffic <br />progression make all red appropriate. <br /> <br /> <br />YELLOW CLEARANCE INTERVAL <br /> <br />The City of Eugene uses a minimum 4.0 yellow change interval for all signals with approach <br />speeds 40 MPH and under. This builds in a buffer of yellow time and represents an existing <br />extension of yellow time beyond established minimums. The Manual of Traffic Signal Design <br />calculates a value of 3.2 seconds for a 30 MPH signal approach. We have rounded up the yellow <br />interval for all the downtown signals and other signals on 30 MPH roads by at least 25% or 0.8 <br />seconds. In comparison, the City of Beaverton uses 3.5 seconds at photo-enforced streets with 30 <br />MPH approach speeds. At speeds of 35 MPH and 40 MPH Beaverton uses 4.0 second yellow <br />interval. Extending the yellow interval too much leads to poor compliance as the driver who <br />reached a complete stop on yellow may be tempted to continue through the next yellow <br />indication. Excessive yellow will also reduce available green time similar to an all red phase. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />