Item 4: Ordinance Concerning State Motor Pool Site

Home Browse Search

also posted in accordance with EC 9.7415(5) on August 17, 2006 and published in the Register Guard on August 30, 2006. G . On September 19, 2006, the Eugene Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application and left the record open for additional information. H . On October 30, 2006, the Eugene Planning Commission continued its deliberations on the application and voted to recommend approval of the request as revised by the applicant. I. On November 9, 2006, notice of the Eugene City Council public hearing was mailed to the applicant, neighborhood association, and those who had requested to be placed on the interested parties list for the Metro Plan amendment. Notice was also published in the Register Guard, and the notice and text of this Ordinance posted on the City’s web site on November 5, 2006. J . The Eugene City Council held a public hearing on the request on November 20, 2006, and is now ready to take action on the requested amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above findings, and the findings set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference are hereby adopted. Section 2. The Metro Plan Diagram land use designation for the property identified as Map 17-03-30-44, Tax Lot 8900, referred to as the State Motor Pool site, is amended from High Density Residential/Mixed Use/Nodal Development designation to Commercial/Nodal Development designation as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. The zoning for the property identified as Map 17-03-30-44, Tax Lot 8900, referred to as the Oregon Motor Pool site, is rezoned from I-2/TD, Light-Medium Industrial with Transit Oriented Development Overlay Zone to C-2/TD/ND Community Commercial with Transit Oriented Development and Nodal Development Overlay Zones, as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and that holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this _____ day of February, 2007 ____ day of February, 2007 ___________________________ ____________________________ City Recorder Mayor Ordinance - 2