Laserfiche WebLink
ordinance after it was adopted would require a public hearing and could take considerable time. She hoped <br />a new proposal was developed that would have broader community support. <br /> <br />Roll call vote, the vote on the motion to postpone action on a transportation system <br />maintenance fee was a 4:4 tie, with councilors Pryor, Bettman, Taylor and Ortiz <br />voting in support, and councilors Kelly, Poling, Solomon and Papé voting in oppo- <br />sition. Mayor Piercy voted in favor of the motion, and it passed on a final vote of <br />5:4. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy commented that as much as she wanted to see a TSMF move forward a tie vote was not a <br />good way for that to happen; there needed to be a broader level of agreement and consensus. <br /> <br /> <br />4. ACTION: Appointments to the Budget Committee <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Ortiz, moved to appoint Robert Peters <br />to Position 3 on the Budget Committee for a three-year term beginning November <br />1, 2006, and ending October 31, 2009. Roll call vote, the motion to appoint Robert <br />Peters passed, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Ortiz, moved to appoint Rick Gates to <br />Position 7 on the Budget Committee to complete the unexpired term of Mike Clark, <br />a term beginning upon appointment and ending on October 31, 2007. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Papé, moved to amend the motion by <br />substituting the name Rich Gaston for Rick Gates. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon said she supported Rich Gaston for the position. She felt he was exceptionally articulate <br />and was well-versed on the City’s budget; his breadth of experience would be valuable to the Budget <br />Committee. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman stated that she would not support the amendment and would support Mr. Gates’ <br />appointment if the amendment failed. She said there was little diversity of thinking on the Budget <br />Committee as many members were business people. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor said it was a dilemma for him as Mr. Gates lived in Ward 8 and he was always pleased to <br />see Ward 8 residents become involved in committees and other groups. He had met with Mr. Gates and he <br />had many good ideas, although he had only been in the community a short amount of time. He felt that Mr. <br />Gaston had a somewhat better grasp of some of the issues before the Budget Committee; he would work <br />with Mr. Gates to help him become involved in other activities with the City but vote for Mr. Gaston. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly agreed with Councilor Bettman’s statement and indicated he would vote against the <br />amendment in order to support Mr. Gates. He viewed Mr. Gates’ relatively short residency as an asset to <br />bring a fresher outside perspective. He noted that Mr. Gates had quickly become involved in the community <br />and was chair of the City Club’s program committee. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé felt both candidates brought good qualifications to the position but thought Mr. Gaston had <br />a longer tenure with the City and broader contacts in the community. He encouraged Mr. Gates’ enthusiasm <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 27, 2006 Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />