Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilor Papé asked if there was time to act before Measure 39 took effect. Mr. Lidz replied that Measure <br />39 would take effect next week and in his opinion would not apply retroactively, although he was not certain <br />how “retroactive” would be interpreted in terms of the offer process in a condemnation case. He did not <br />think that Measure 39 would apply to the offers already made but would apply to any offers made after its <br />effective date, particularly the requirement that the City pay attorney fees if the City made an offer that was <br />less than the jury found the property to be worth after an eminent domain trial. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé asked if Measure 39 could be avoided by an ordinance to condemn. Mr. Lidz said he did <br />not think that would avoid Measure 39. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz asked if the City had made market-value offers. Ms. Weiss replied that offers were based <br />on property appraisals. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz asked if staff had considered making higher offers to owners. Ms. Weiss said staff would <br />entertain a counter-offer as long as it could be substantiated. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz stressed the importance of acquiring land soon as suitable sites were disappearing as the <br />area was subdivided and developed. She asked if there had been any contact with the Christianson family. <br />Ms. Weiss said that a meeting had been scheduled. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling expressed confusion about a memorandum dated October 30, 2006, from Parks and Open <br />Space Director Johnny Medlin. He asked if the offer to purchase delivered to the Farver family was under <br />the current zoning or future zoning if the City acquired the property and rezoned it. Mr. Medlin said the <br />Farver parcel was outside of the urban growth boundary (UGB) and if the City acquired it there would not <br />be a move to rezone it in the near future; the appraisal and offer were based on the current zoning. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling asked if the MacClay parcel had been sold and the City was now working with a different <br />owner. Mr. Medlin said there was a current dispute based on a purchase agreement between the MacClay <br />family and Clyde Beat and staff was not clear about the outcome of that dispute. He said staff was working <br />with both the MacClay family and Mr. Beat to make the City’s interest in purchasing the property known. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor commended staff for its “enormous” efforts to acquire park land in the Santa Clara area. <br />He said the problem was finding a parcel with enough acreage to be suitable for a community park and <br />finding contiguous parcels was even more difficult. He said the process was also going slowly because of <br />the lack of willing sellers and he was appreciative of the work session to update the council. He thought the <br />sites around Madison Middle School were ideal because of the school/park connection and neighbors in the <br />area were helping the City work on the matter. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asserted that there was no such thing as an unwilling seller; it was just a matter of price. <br />She suggested that staff consider hiring a consultant to assertively negotiate purchase of property. She <br />agreed with Councilor Pryor’s comments about the sites adjacent to Madison Middle School. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor remarked that the City had made its intention clear to all of the owners of parcels of <br />interest and the conversations were ongoing. He remained optimistic that the willing seller approach was the <br />preferred approach, Measure 39 notwithstanding, as it had worked well for the City in assembling park <br />properties. He emphasized the need to confirm that the neighborhood also regarded the sites as suitable for <br />a community park. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 27, 2006 Page 12 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />