Laserfiche WebLink
of the General Obligation Bonds approved for parks. She said the City routinely did so at the point in time <br />the council had committed itself to issuing debt. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to adopt Resolution 1042 delegating au- <br />thority to declare official intent to reimburse expenditures. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman understood that this was a different process than delegating the authority to the City <br />Manager for Parks and Open Space bonds which was a defined amount of money. She asserted that the <br />Urban Renewal District had a provision in its plan that indicated that $250,000 could be spent without <br />coming before council for any project that “could be even loosely construed as benefiting the Urban Renewal <br />District.” She did not think there were any constraints. She believed that this was not a $250,000 per year <br />cap, rather it meant the City Manager could authorize “$250,000 period for any expenditures.” She called <br />this vast latitude for expenditures. She was inclined not to support the resolution. She felt the same thing <br />could be accomplished by bringing these things to the council. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy asked if there was a reason for following the procedure as per the resolution over the way that <br />Councilor Bettman had mentioned in her comments. Ms. Cutsogeorge replied that the biggest difference <br />between supporting the resolution and opposing it would be that opposition would result in Finance staff <br />coming to three meetings instead of two, as staff would have to come and request the delegation authority <br />that the City Manager would be given by the resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy suggested that the resolution would cut a meeting but having these items come before the <br />council alerted the council to activity. Ms. Cutsogeorge responded that the council would know about the <br />activity because the first step in the process would be that the council would say it wanted to fund the <br />project. This was the trigger for such a resolution. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor pointed out that every debt to be issued would require council action. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor said anything that caused the council to focus more on expenditures and caused the public <br />to be more aware was a good thing. She was concerned about “how easy it is” to spend urban renewal <br />funds. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asserted that these items do not come often and could “certainly” be in the form of a <br />Consent Calendar item with an explanation. She thought the “inconvenience” would be negligible but in <br />terms of the “accountability factor” it seemed to have significance. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency at 8:16 p.m. and reconvened the <br />meeting of the City Council. <br /> <br /> <br />7. ACTION: <br />An Ordinance Prohibiting Extreme Fighting; Adding Section 4.740 to the Eugene Code, 1971; and <br />Amending Section 4.990 of that Code <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked City Attorney Jerry Lidz to briefly describe the ordinance and the issues before <br />the council. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 8, 2007 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />