My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/26/01 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2001
>
CC Minutes - 02/26/01 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:48 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 1:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilor Rayor believed the motion should be adopted because it addressed to some degree the <br />uncertainty of the retroactivity of Measure 7. Mr. Klein concurred. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson supported the motion. She acknowledged the effort represented by the <br />update and regretted the code could not be implemented now. She noted Eugene's lack of <br />support for Ballot Measure 7. Eugene wanted a strong code for purposes of supporting <br />community values. In addition, the update was not intended to impose onerous new standards, <br />but was intended to fix things in the code that were broken, to make improvements to existing <br />code text, to clarify the code, and to reflect new and evolving community standards. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey supported the motion. He said the motion would give the council time to consider <br />the ramifications of the code, and it recognized the risk facing the community. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner pointed out that the Growth Management Study policies were adopted <br />unanimously by the council in response to a public outreach effort that involved thousands of <br />people. The update was intended to implement those policies. Councilor Meisner said a court <br />decision could happen anytime, and the motion allowed the update to be implemented as that <br />decision was handed down. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ expressed support for the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein recommended that the council delete the provision in the motion stipulating that the <br />ordinance became effect 30 days following a court decision regarding Measure 7. He said that <br />the provision was not needed. He recommended the motion read the ordinance would become <br />effective on the effective date of a final court decision. Councilors Kelly and Taylor indicated <br />acceptance of Mr. Klein's recommendation as a friendly amendment to the amendment. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the amendment, with the deletion of the provision that the <br /> ordinance became effective 30 days after the effective date of a final court <br /> decision voiding Measure 7 and with the addition of a provision that the <br /> ordinance would become effective on the effective date of a court decision, <br /> passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved to amend the draft <br /> ordinance concerning land use regulations as follows: <br /> <br /> A. Page 30, change title of term in definitions from "Parking Garage" to <br /> "Structured Parking." <br /> <br /> Change all references on zoning land use and permit requirement <br /> tables from "Parking Garage" to "Structured Parking". <br /> <br /> Page 54, clarify that the requirement for structured parking in C-3 applies to <br /> spaces that directly serve a primary use on the same development site by <br /> changing Accessory Use in Table 9.2160 to read: <br /> <br /> Accessory Use. An example includes storage and distribution incidental to <br /> the primary use of the site. Parking areas that are accessory to a primary <br /> use on the same development site shall comply with EC 9.2161(5). <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 26, 2000 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.