Laserfiche WebLink
(c) There shall be at least 1 off-street parking space on the <br /> property. <br /> <br />The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved to amend the draft <br /> ordinance concerning land use regulations as follows: <br /> <br /> 1. Page 109, amend Table 9.2750 Residential Zone Development <br /> Standards to clarify outdoor living area requirements by referencing <br /> only "Minimum Total Open Space" and deleting references to <br /> "Common Open Space" and "Private Open Space." <br /> <br /> 2. Page 111, amend EC 9.2751 (12) to read: <br /> <br /> For multiple-family projects, refer to EC 9.5500(9) Open Space. <br /> <br /> 3. Page 113, amend EC 9.2761(5) to read: <br /> <br /> (5) Exceptions to the maximum lot size shall be granted if either of <br /> the following is met: <br /> <br /> (a) For circumstances such as topographically constrained <br /> lands, conservation easements, existing buildings, utility <br /> easements, and land divisions intended to reserve a <br /> large lot for future land division with feasibility <br /> demonstrated by a conceptual build out plan. <br /> (b) If the subdivision achieves an overall density of nine <br /> units per acre. <br /> <br /> 4. Page 286, amend EC 9.6883 Tree Verification to read: <br /> <br /> Prior to a site change that impacts a significant tree, a tree verification <br /> request form shall be submitted to the City. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said that the motion represented clarifications of changes to the current draft. He <br />thanked Roxie Cuellar of the Lane County Homebuilders Association for calling them to his <br />attention. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner asked staff to confirm the motion reflected a clarification and had no other <br />effect. Ms. Bishow concurred. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Councilor PapS, Ms. Bishow said that the tree verification request <br />form would ensure verification before a building permit was issued that the trees impacted by <br />development could be removed. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if (5)(a) meant that a large lot could be set aside for future development. <br />Ms. Bishow clarified that the developer could set aside, for example, a five-acre parcel as long as <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 26, 2000 Page 13 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />