My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 04/04/01 JEO
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2001
>
CC Minutes - 04/04/01 JEO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:27:29 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 1:38:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Joint Elected Officials
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nancy Nathanson, Councilor, City of Eugene, asked when telecommunications <br />would be included in the maps and texts of the public facilities and planned <br />expansion. <br /> <br />Heinkel responded they considered that at the beginning but there wasn't enough <br />interest in including telecommunications. <br /> <br />Jim Croteau, City of Eugene, stated the whole approach to periodic review had <br />been to do what the state required, but not anything extra. He added since <br />telecommunications was not part of the public facility plan, it was not included. <br /> <br />Nathanson stated that telecommunications is becoming an essential utility, and <br />should become part of the planning document. <br /> <br />Weeldreyer concurred with Nathanson. <br /> <br />Betty Taylor, Councilor, City of Eugene, suggested they plan for the use of facilities <br />and not spread them out. <br /> <br />Bonny Bettman, Councilor, City of Eugene, regretted there was so little involvement <br />with the public. She said a new tactic was needed because people weren't <br />attending public forums. With regard to policy G 35 (supporting subsidies for <br />development that fulfills goals and recommendations of the Metro Plan) she said <br />(given the scarce resources), that it might serve the communities better if they <br />looked to more specific wording so the subsidies were directed toward high density, <br />infill and mixed use development. She asked to drop Goal GM Policy #2, because <br />based on the DLCD's recommendation, it was not consistent with Goal 14. She <br />said there were changes that happened after the planning commissions examined <br />it. She wanted a statement on limiting runoff. She noted that in the glossary "full <br />range" included transit, but the minimal level did not. She explained it stated that <br />land within the urban growth boundary might be converted from urbanizable to <br />urban only through annexation to a city. She noted they could be converting land to <br />urban without any transit service because the requirement for the full range was <br />broad. She wanted that language strengthened. <br /> <br />On Goal 14 issues that Bettman discussed, Heinkel explained that staff had also <br />discussed the letter from DLCD and their recommendation was to delete the policy. <br /> <br />On the G 17 policy, Bettman noted that her comments were based on testimony <br />from George Grier. She suggested taking out "reduces the negative effects" from <br />increases and run off to say, "and runoff." <br /> <br />David Kelly, Councilor, City of Eugene, echoed Nathanson's on the importance of <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.