Laserfiche WebLink
It may be worse in Portland (who ironically, reached an early agreement with Airbnb), partly because <br />the permit is so expensive ($178 to rent one or two bedrooms, up to $5,000 for three to five) and the <br />rules so stringent, partly because the city has not been able to obtain the rental companies’ data. That <br />most hosts do pay the taxes on their earnings implies they are not scofflaws and that an adjustment of <br />the ordinance would turn them “legal.” It is difficult to tell if harm is being done, despite a Willamette <br />Week article speculating that if the illegal Airbnb rentals disappeared, “as many as 1,718 homes could <br />be made available to Portland residents instead of tourists.” (They don’t bother to add up the total days <br />into a figure for full-time rentals.) Hosts without permits in Petaluma, CA also voiced concerns about the <br />bureaucratic process inflicted on them, and considered the fees in addition to high property taxes to be <br />somewhat of an insult added to injury. <br />New Orleans’ French Quarter, likely a ground zero for STRs even before Internet-based platforms, has <br />seldom enforced its ban on rentals under 60 days, and given the enduring nature of the practice in that <br />city, coming to an arrangement that allows collection of revenue may be a nod to reality. Nevertheless <br />the same battle as in other cities is being replayed, with a ban on STRs in the French Quarter and a <br />temporary ban on issuing of licenses for whole-home rentals as of late 2018. <br />The three instances in which cities can collect fees from STR hosts have been handled very differently <br />even among large cities, as a chart in a Hurdlr article compares New York City, Los Angeles, San <br />Francisco, Chicago and Austin. Three of the cities don’t even charge for a business license. Several have <br />taxes that seem nominal compared to the 14% Transient Occupancy Tax charged in Los Angeles and San <br />Francisco, yet San Francisco may be one of the compliant locations due to better relations between <br />Airbnb and that city. The Oakland report above notes that STR businesses in that city had not been <br />subject to the TOT until the city signed an agreement for Airbnb to collect the tax (the Community <br />Compact). Even with that in place, they find what Airbnb is turning over is not the full amount. The <br />Stulberg article mentions a possible pressure point, at least for properties fully given over to STRs: If a <br />property is a de facto hotel it can be designated “commercial.” <br />A balance may have to be struck between what can be realistically collected with the costs of <br />monitoring compliance by hosts—which leads to another example of sharing economy <br />entrepreneurship: Vendors who will monitor STR compliance for cities. Eugene and various other <br />Oregon cities have availed themselves of this service, according to an August 2018 news story. <br />Given that keeping STRs, and Airbnb, out altogether is a tall order, some cities have opted for measures <br />to limit their impact. One means is to sequester them by restricting licenses to certain sections of town; <br />the other somewhat opposite approach is to limit their density, thus dispersing them. At least a couple <br />of communities in Oregon (see below) have gone these different routes. <br />The Internet-based STR business model is so new that cities’ code responses have had to start from <br />scratch, with first-try ordinances often being modified. Based on the above examples and others, the <br />most effective legislative approach may be to require a reasonably priced license, have streamlined <br />processes that don’t overly inconvenience the hosts, and have monitoring that doesn’t overstrain local <br />government resources but which assures collection of taxes. Because crafting effective legislation can <br />take several tries spread over months or years, the process should begin soon in order to take <br />advantage of opportunities in the near future. <br />A tale of two cities: The regulatory battle to incorporate short-term residential rentals into modern <br />law. Dana Palombo. American University Business Law Review. 4/2, 2015. <br />September 23, 2019, Work Session – Item 3