Laserfiche WebLink
as agenda item E in paragraphs 2 and 5 on page 6 of the minutes of the regular meeting of April <br />9, 2001. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey determined there was no objection to the proposed changes to the minutes. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman had a minutes correction (Item A). She referred to page 4 of the April 9, 2001, <br />work session minutes and asked that the second sentence in paragraph 4 be changed to read <br />(italicized text added; struck text deleted): "She had a reservation about the recommendation for <br />* ........... *-~'~'*o '-"'~ angled parking." <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey determined there was no objection to the proposed change to the minutes. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion to approve items A, B, D, and F passed <br /> unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />The council considered Item C. Councilor Kelly noted concerns about the City's position on <br />House Bill (HB) 2523. The bill would raise the threshold for contracts subject to prevailing wage <br />rates from $25,000 to $250,000. He objected to the position because while there may be cost <br />savings to the City, there would be wages lost if the minimum threshold was raised, and the <br />threshold was being raised by an order of magnitude rather than an inflation factor or step <br />increase. He noted the Oregon AFL-CI©'s opposition to the bill. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend Item C <br /> by changing the City's position for HB 2523 to Priority 2, Oppose. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman supported the motion because the council's goals included one of supporting <br />family-wage jobs. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Nathanson about when the threshold was initially set, <br />City Manager Jim Johnson estimated approximately 15 years ago. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion to amend Item C passed unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor referred to HB 3784, which prohibited a licensed ambulance service from <br />allowing an employee impaired by fatigue or other factors from working in an ambulance, and <br />asked the reason for the City's opposition. She referred to HB 3466, which defines growth-related <br />action and required cities and counties to give notice of proposed growth-related actions and their <br />effect, and asked the same question. Responding to the first question, City Manager Jim Johnson <br />said that the City followed the rule now, and did not allow employees impaired by fatigue to work <br />on an ambulance. He said that the City preferred the decision be made at the local level rather <br />than by the State legislature. <br /> <br />Regarding HB 3466, Councilor Rayor said that the bill was an unfunded mandate that imposed <br />additional requirements on the City; he added that there was a series of similar bills regarding land <br />use currently in the legislature that would have the practical effect of hamstringing land use <br />planning. Planning Director Jan Childs concurred with Councilor Rayor's statement. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor preferred to be neutral on HB 3466. She thought it was simply a matter of <br />keeping people informed, and said the City should not be opposing the legislation. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 14, 2001 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />