Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Taylor moved to amend the motion that if the council did not <br /> extend the time, the word restraint be applied to the council and that it <br /> not speak in response to the public forum. The motion to amend died <br /> for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor and Councilor Kelly accepted a friendly amendment from Councilor Nathanson to <br />add the phrase "to speak before the public forum is closed" to the end of the last sentence in the <br />paragraph. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />Regarding Item G, Councilor Kelly suggested that no action was needed if no councilor intended <br />to go on the trip to Irkutsk. Mayor Torrey said that he heard rumors there were councilors <br />interested in attending. No councilors present were available to attend. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Kelly, to table Item G. Roll call <br /> vote; the motion passed unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />5. PUBLIC HEARING and POSSIBLE ACTION: <br /> Ordinance Amending Section 7 of Ordinance No. 20224 to Provide an Effective Date <br /> of August 1, 2001 <br /> And <br /> Ordinance Amending Section 4 of Ordinance No. 20225 to Provide an Effective Date <br /> of August 1, 2001 <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey asked if the ordinance required the City staff to evaluate the removal of any tree on <br />any property, and how much that would cost. Senior Planner Teresa Bishow said that the staff <br />would verify, prior to issuance of a permit, that a tree could be cut. She clarified it was not a new <br />practice, but it would require resources to track and monitor. In general, citizens currently called <br />the City to ask if they could cut trees, and for information about regulations. Mayor Torrey asked <br />how many additional staff would be added. Ms. Bishow said that staff estimated one FTE (Full- <br />Time Equivalent). Planning Director Jan Childs said the Budget Committee would receive a <br />memorandum from the Urban Forester on the topic for its Wednesday meeting. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ asked if the implementation date for the Land Use Code Update (LUCU) would <br />require a lot of overtime for preparation. Ms. Childs said that staff was in the process of getting <br />prepared now. The only issue that came up since the last council work session was that a lot of <br />Planning Division staff take vacation in August because the council and Planning Commission are <br />in recess at that time. An August 1 effective date meant that those staff may have to rearrange <br />those plans. She did not think it would involve much overtime to prepare for implementation. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Bill Kloos, PO Box 11906, Eugene, submitted written testimony. He said he represented the <br />Lane County Homebuilders Association in its pending appeal of the Land Use Code Update to the <br />Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). He endorsed the comments to be made byAI Johnson. Mr. <br />Kloos advised the council not to take the action it was contemplating because it was precluded by <br />State law from amending an ordinance under appeal at LUBA. A citation from LUBA relevant to <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 14, 2001 Page 7 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />