Laserfiche WebLink
Regarding the planned location of the facility, Councilor Fart said that it was ideal. He cited the <br />ease of transportation and the lower land cost as examples of that rating. <br /> <br />Councilor Fart urged the council to rally behind the grant request. He said it was a huge issue <br />that would affect the community for many years to come. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly commented that the Child Advocacy Center did extraordinarily valuable work. He <br />expressed his pleasure that Lane County was also funding the center and that Eugene's funding <br />was contingent on funds from the City of Springfield. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly raised concern that the request did not use the correct process. He was not <br />comfortable with the idea of the City Council dictating to the Community Development Block Grant <br />Advisory Committee. <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson acknowledged that it was unusual for the City to ask the committee to hold <br />aside that much funding for one request but noted that the amount of leverage on the facility was <br />also very different (1/10 of the total cost). He acknowledged that the advisory committee usually <br />had a larger role. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly stressed that the request was worthwhile but noted that there were other worthy <br />projects that had gone through the standard process. He stressed the importance of grant <br />requests going through the correct process. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly noted that nonprofit contingency requests were limited to $5,000. He said that <br />other requests had been asked to cut down their requests to that amount. He acknowledged that <br />it would be inappropriate to cut a $50,000 request to $5,000 so he suggested that the funding <br />come out of the main contingency account from FY01-02. He commented that the $5,000 limit <br />should not be "thrown out the window." <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved to amend the motion <br /> so that the contingency money was taken from general council contingency, <br /> combined FY01-02, as necessary. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ commented that the council was leaping over standards that it had set. He <br />suggested that the contingency money be removed and that staff be challenged to find the money <br />from the 2002 budget. He raised concern over the precedent set by the council violating its own <br />processes. <br /> <br /> Councilor Pap~, moved to amend the amendment to stop the use of any <br /> contingency funds and request that the City Manager come back with a <br /> request that was worked into the budget process. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the vote on the amendment to the amendment was a tie. <br /> Mayor Torrey voted in opposition. The amendment to the amendment failed, <br /> 5:4, with councilors Pap~, Bettman, Meisner, and Rayor voting in favor. <br /> <br />Speaking to the original amendment, Councilor Nathanson was willing to support the change if it <br />moved the process forward. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 11, 2001 Page 4 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />