My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: PH on Resolution Concerning Measure 37 Claim (Brown)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 03/12/07 Meeting
>
Item 3: PH on Resolution Concerning Measure 37 Claim (Brown)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:45:06 PM
Creation date
3/8/2007 2:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Waiving the FAR requirement will allow a piece of real estate near the downtown core to <br />be developed with a building that will be most compatible with other properties in the <br />neighborhood, rather than to require the construction of a monstrous structure that will <br />not fit the current or likely future characteristics of the immediate neighborhood. We're <br />asking for the owners of this property to be allowed to develop an in-fill property with a <br />project that is compatible to the neighborhood and that will continue to support the <br />downtown area. <br /> <br />No building type could be constructed to the 1: 1 FAR requirements and still be <br />financially feasible. If we do not develop the site with the intended use, our best <br />alternative is to sell it to the adjacent property owner for their continued use as a parking <br />lot. If we do not develop the site, I am highly confident it would remain a surface <br />parking lot far into the future. <br /> <br />This is the reason we filed our Measure 37 claim. We are not asking to make more <br />profits, we are simply asking to be able to develop the property with the use that is most <br />compatible with the neighborhood, makes economic sense, and allows a 30-year <br />downtown company to continue to own and maintain an office building in the downtown <br />core. Last year I spent approximately 3 months working with 1000 Friends et al in Salem <br />on BM 37 issues, ,and I'm currently assisting Senator Prozanski with valuation issues <br />relating to Measure 37 claims. <br /> <br />In closing, I wish there were alternative courses of action to develop our 1 ih and <br />Charnelton property. After discussions with city staff, planners and architects, we <br />realized we had no choice if Duncan & Brown were to stay downtown. Measure 37 <br />claims are not malignant by definition; though I believe the largest portion of claims are <br />inappropriate, I do think there are some claims that may be appropriate, like ours. <br /> <br />Thank you for your thoughtful consideration and for your service to our community. <br /> <br />John H Brown <br />DMB Green LLC <br />1260 Chamelton Street <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.