My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Ordinance Amending Metro Plan and Refinement Plan - Huntington Crossing
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 03/12/07 Meeting
>
Item 5: Ordinance Amending Metro Plan and Refinement Plan - Huntington Crossing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:52:00 PM
Creation date
3/8/2007 2:49:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planning & Development <br /> <br /> Planning <br /> <br /> <br />City of Eugene <br />M <br />th <br /> 99 West 10 Avenue <br />EMORANDUM <br /> Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br /> (541) 682-5377 <br /> (541) 682-5572 FAX <br /> www.eugene-or.gov <br />Date: <br />March 5, 2007 <br /> <br />To: <br />Mayor Piercy and City Council <br /> <br />From: <br />Lydia McKinney, 682-5485 <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> Staff Responses to City Council and Land County Board of Questions Regarding Huntington <br />Crossing Metro Plan Amendment <br /> <br />This memo provides staff response to the questions raised by City Council on February 22 2007, regarding <br />the Huntington Crossing request for a Metro Plan amendment. Staff notes that there was information in the <br />record to respond to questions 2-8, but no information was in the record to respond to question 1. <br /> <br />Chase Node: <br />1. Council asked whether the development at the Chase Node went through a Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) process. <br /> <br />Staff response: There is no information regarding the Chase Node in the record. Therefore, a response <br />to this question would be considered new evidence, which is not permitted in the quasi-judicial <br />proceedings for a Metro Plan amendment. <br /> <br />Requiring a Master Plan as part of a Metro Plan amendment: <br />2. Council asked whether there is a <br />way to require a Master Plan for the subject property as part of the Metro Plan amendment. <br /> <br /> Staff response: There is not a mechanism to require a “Master Plan” for the subject property unless <br />council makes a finding that an applicable approval criterion can only be met by imposition of such a <br />condition. The Planning Commission did not make such a finding. Council should note however, that <br />the existing refinement plan already requires a similar tool. Policy (5) within the Willakenzie Area <br />Plan for he Coburg/Crescent Subarea states: <br /> <br />The City of Eugene shall require that planned unit development procedures be required for all <br />residential developments within the Coburg/Crescent Subarea. The intent of this requirement is to <br />ensure adequate review of the following factors: <br /> <br />A.Development of a comprehensive street network; <br /> <br />B.Provision of pedestrian and bicycle linkages between residential, commercial, industrial, <br />educational and recreational areas; <br /> <br />C.Encouragement of a variety of dwelling types, heights, and setbacks; <br /> <br />D.Provision of adequate and attractive buffering between residential, commercial, and <br />industrial developments; and <br /> <br />E.Provision of pedestrian linkages to transit stops where practical. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.