Laserfiche WebLink
zone change to R-2, this zoning would allow residential development at densities from 10 to 28 <br />dwelling units per acre. The subject property is approximately 6.89 acres in area, which would allow <br />68 to 193 dwelling units. Requirements for parking, landscaping, and multi-family development <br />standards would be applicable to the development proposal. <br /> <br /> <br />Provide a limitation for the subject property to allow medium density residential use only: <br />7. <br />Council asked whether there is a way to assure that only medium density residential use would be <br />allowed, presumably to prohibit the ability to do commercial uses in a future development proposal. <br /> <br />Staff response: The current proposal is for a Metro Plan diagram amendment, with consistent changes <br />to refinement plan maps. In rare circumstances, applicants have limited such requests to allow for only <br />specific uses, and provided findings that only support those limited uses. In a few of those cases, the <br />City has considered the imposition of property-specific limitations on allowed uses. In this case, the <br />Planning Commission found that the applicant’s analysis is sufficient to support the proposed re- <br />designation and map changes without use restrictions. In cases where a use restriction is warranted, <br />staff recommends that the use limitation be adopted as a text amendment to the applicable refinement <br />plan to best ensure future notice and enforcement of such a limitation. Staff has some concern that a <br />use limitation for the subject property that would prohibit a retail/commercial use in conjunction with a <br />residential PUD may be inconsistent with other policies in the Coburg/Crescent Subarea of the <br />Willakenzie Area Plan. Such existing policies encourage mixed use developments, including some <br />commercial use within a residential PUD. If the council wishes to pursue a text amendment to the <br />refinement plan, additional staff time will be needed to develop a proposal. <br /> <br /> <br />Why should this request be considered when people didn’t have an opportunity before to change <br />8. <br />the designation: <br />The Board of Commissioners asked why they should be compelled to approve this <br />Metro Plan amendment request when changing the designation wasn’t available to residents before. <br /> <br />Staff Response: This Metro Plan amendment is being requested by a private property owner as a <br />citizen initiated request. Staff notes that the code does provide for any citizen to initiate a Metro Plan <br />amendment request at any time as per EC 9.9.7715(2)(b). <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Additional Information <br />For additional information, please contact Lydia McKinney Associate Planner, at 682-5485 or via email at <br /> <br /> <br />lydia.s.mckinney@ci.eugene.or.us. <br /> <br /> <br />