My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 07/09/01 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2001
>
CC Minutes - 07/09/01 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:29:45 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 1:43:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilor Meisner offered a correction to the June 11, 2001 minutes. On page 6, he noted that <br />the recorded vote result had been 6:2, with himself and Councilor Pap~ voting in opposition. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />III.PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Concerning the Downtown Mall; Repealing the Sunset <br /> Provisions of Section 2 of Ordinance Number 20121 and Section 3 of Ordinance <br /> 20122; Repealing Ordinance Number 20149, Ordinance Number 20150, and Ordinance <br /> Number 20227; Amending Section 4.874 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and Providing an <br /> Immediate Effective Date <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Misha Seymour, 1313 Lincoln Street, said that a continuation and expansion of the Mall <br />Exclusion Ordinance would be a "mean spirited policy." He urged that the council deal with things <br />in a humane way. <br /> <br />Mark Johnson, 1320 Inglewood Drive, said the ordinance was a good tool for police and urged <br />support for the plan. <br /> <br />Rachel Perkins, 838 West 4th Avenue, opined that the mall ordinance was unconstitutional. She <br />said that the ordinance punished people for poverty and she urged the council not to expand it. <br />She went on to say that if the council cared more about people than it did about business, it would <br />eliminate the ordinance altogether, rather than expanding it. <br /> <br />Russ Brink, 132 East Broadway, commented that the ordinance worked and did not target any <br />specific part of the population. <br /> <br />There being no further requests to speak, Mayor Torrey closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly noted that the current exclusion ordinance included three blocks of Broadway. He <br />raised concern that the proposed expansion would increase the exclusion area by a factor of four <br />and commented that would not be a mall exclusion ordinance anymore. He raised concern over <br />the precedent that this would set and suggested the council was "putting a band-aid" on a public <br />service problem. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 9, 2001 Page 4 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.