Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Nathanson thought the display cases in the Council Chamber could be used better and should <br />be illuminated. She said that the open area between the door and seating area was visually, <br />although not physically, separated from the main chamber, and people stood there and talked while <br />the meeting proceeded, which was disruptive. She asked if anything was being done about the <br />situation. Mr. Johnson said that some of the separators were structural and could not be removed. <br />Facilities staff was working on the situation, but had not found any easy solution. He thought <br />work was also occurring on the display cases, and indicated he would follow-up with a note to Ms. <br />Nathanson. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said that often there were materials posted on the McNutt Room walls, and they <br />were generally easy to view. She asked how such materials would be displayed in the Council <br />Chamber, and if the upgrade included equipment for projecting images. Mr. Johnson said there <br />would be portable easels for display of materials, and a projector and portable screen were being <br />purchased. He confirmed, in response to a follow-up comment from Ms. Nathanson, that the <br />podiums were being fixed. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman agreed with the comments of Ms. Nathanson, Mr. Kelly, and Mr. Meisner. She <br />appreciated the scale of the McNutt Room for work sessions and suggested it be expanded. She <br />agreed that the McNutt Room space was tight, but believed that, particularly in the case of the <br />Budget Committee, it was not nourishing enough to serve a box lunch to members and staff <br />coming to a long meeting after a day at work. She favored keeping work sessions in the McNutt <br />Room and suggested staff consider ways to make the room work better. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor agreed with the remarks of Mr. Meisner, Ms. Bettman, Mr. Kelly, and Ms. Nathanson. <br />She thought work sessions should continue to be held in the McNutt Room, and agreed it could <br />be expanded. She said that people who come to meetings after work deserve a meal when they <br />arrive. She agreed with Ms. Nathanson about the display cases, saying if they were better lit their <br />appearance would be improved. Regarding the open space, she thought it was needed for people <br />to talk to each other as they needed to go somewhere, unless the City choose to install a covered <br />area outside the chamber. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey thought the council should have all meetings in the facility because the McNutt <br />Room was not accessible to many wheelchair users. He had asked the manager to consider the <br />configuration because of conversations he had with people in wheelchairs who pointed out the <br />difficulty of accessing the room. He did not think the City served its citizens when it stopped them <br />from attending meetings and being comfortable. He pointed out that the councilors were <br />frequently forced to move from their seats when PowerPoint presentations were made. He did not <br />understand the argument that the council was uncomfortable talking with people in the audience. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey pointed out that Budget Committee meetings had been fully attended and a seat was <br />difficult to find. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 18, 2001 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />