Laserfiche WebLink
reviews that existed now and questioned councilors who wanted to give Planning staff more <br />discretion. Mr. Lewis criticized the council for changing its positions regarding the six blocks west <br />of the hospital during its negotiations with PeaceHealth. <br /> <br />Debra Telew, 30065 Lebleu Road, criticized the Gang of 9 for anonymity and for using malicious <br />ways to communicate. She asked who the members of the Gang of 9 were and why they were <br />attacking the City Council. She said the councilors have shown they care about the heart of the <br />city and its future. She questioned who gained if Ms. Bettman and Mr. Kelly were not if office, <br />suggesting it was PeaceHealth and developers. She questioned The Register-Guard's support for <br />the Gang of 9 approach. She said that progressive people should mobilize now and have their <br />voices heard so that the Gang of 9 was not running the city. <br /> <br />Peggy Fisher, 2808 Capital Drive, shared the concerns expressed by Ms. Bildberback about the <br />changes being made to the Owens Rose Garden. She shared some criticisms of those changes with <br />the council, including the location of the new walkway, which resulted in the loss of valuable old <br />roses, the location of the gazebo, and the rose planting contemplated. Ms. Fisher invited the <br />council to join her on a tour of the garden and invited calls. <br /> <br />Marcella Moore, 2812 Friendly Street, related the history of the old rose section in the Owens <br />Rose Garden, which was one of the largest public collections of old garden roses in the west. She <br />reiterated the remarks of previous speakers regarding the changes taking place at Owens Rose <br />Garden. Ms. Moore wished more rose experts had been consulted about what should be done in <br />the garden. <br /> <br />Cynthia Kirkham, 3335 St. Kitts Avenue, requested the council continue to work for what was <br />in the best interest of the community in terms of PeaceHealth. She acknowledged PeaceHealth's <br />need to expand its facilities, but felt its relocation to the north would be detrimental to that area as <br />well as to the core. The needed infrastructure improvements in north Eugene would be costly. <br />Ms. Kirkham was frustrated by the fact the City had not prepared comparative information about <br />the costs of the different sites. She thought it important that any development on the north Eugene <br />site be consistent with the Willakenzie Plan. She did not think the Crescent site could support a <br />hospital of the magnitude proposed, and urged the council to rezone the property so the hospital <br />could not expand there. <br /> <br />Dan Herbert, 1913 Potter Street, encouraged the council to continue the City staff work <br />comparing alternative sites for PeaceHealth. He thought the site was still an open question, and <br />even if the hospital built on its Crescent site, Eugene would still need another hospital soon in the <br />central city. He thought the planning studies would provide a justification for the creation of one <br />or more exclusive hospital zone. Mr. Herbert did not think the City should assume there would <br />always be a monopoly on hospital services in north Eugene. He said the City Council should be <br />specific about procedures for development in a hospital zone. Because he thought the hospital's <br />location was a public issue, Mr. Herbert called for open negotiations with public involvement. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 23, 2001 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />