My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 08/06/01 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2001
>
CC Minutes - 08/06/01 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:30:57 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 1:45:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Torrey did not believe that ODOT would fund anything other than the projects Commissioner Pap~ <br />mentioned. The agency did not believe ~half a WEP" worked. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner expressed frustration with the council's process as exemplified by what he termed the %tacking <br />of motions," saying that it did not allow the council an opportunity to complete discussion. <br /> <br />In regard to the substitute motion, Commissioner Pap~ said he hoped he had been clear in his message to the <br />council about what OTC was willing to do in regard to west Eugene and what it was not willing to do. If the <br />parkway project did not go forward, ODOT would not be involved in funding transportation projects east of <br />Beltline unless they were fully designed and had community support. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman reiterated that by waiting until November, the City would have lost its ability to compete for <br />the STIP funds. She wanted to stay the course of looking at a combined strategy. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner determined from City Attorney Jerome Lidz that successful passage of the motion did not <br />preclude Mr. Pap~ from placing his motion on the floor again. <br /> <br />Mr. Reinhard determined from the maker and second of the substitute motion that the motion included the <br />changes offered by Ms. Nathanson, Ms. Bettman, and Mr. Kelly. <br /> <br /> The substitute motion failed, 5:3; Ms. Bettman, Ms. Taylor, and Mr. Kelly voting <br /> yes. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Kelly regarding the level of ODOT participation in the long-term <br />strategy referred to in item 3 of the list of short-term actions, Commissioner Pap~ clarified that his <br />comments were specifically to the fact ODOT would not be involved in funding for project design and <br />engineering. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly referred to the right-of-way liquidation, and asked if the liquidation could be slowed to give the <br />local jurisdictions time to assemble the money to purchase it from the federal government. Mr. Pirrie said <br />that it was possible, but he was not prepared to speak to the right-of-way liquidation at this point. <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Pap~ briefly left the room. <br />Mr. Farr thought the council owed the community the discussion preceding the vote, or the %ad taste" that <br />was left in many people's mouths from the council's December 2000 decision would continue to exist for a <br />long time. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked Commissioner Pap~ if he was representing the official position of the OTC. Commis- <br />sioner Pap~ indicated he was representing the commission, which had discussed the issue at the last month's <br />meeting, and which had decided at that point what action to take, culminating in the letter from Mr. Warner. <br />He confirmed that the City had just received the letter. <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Pap~ returned to the meeting. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.