Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kelly informed Mr. Henderson that receptors of contamination were not just humans, and <br />hoped that could be "brought out" on the incident sheets. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly observed that it was difficult for a lay person to gauge the level of danger of <br />contamination at a particular location from the DEQ Web site. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly hoped the City evaluated contamination situations to determine if legal action by the City <br />was appropriate on a case-by-case basis. He requested a follow-up memorandum on the subject. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly requested a follow-up memorandum on the Baxter site, particularly the impact on the <br />stormwater channel along Roosevelt Boulevard, and whether third-party litigation had occurred. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson asked if the City routinely added community updates linked to the DEQ fact <br />sheets. <br /> <br />Speaking to Mr. Henderson, Ms. Nathanson thought a site map of the sites mentioned on the DEQ <br />Web site would be helpful given that people were often not familiar with addresses. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson noted that merely because a clean-up project was named after a certain company <br />did not mean that company was responsible for the contamination; the company may have bought <br />a contaminated site and could be seeking legal recourse from the former owners of the property. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson asked if the neighborhood through which the Amazon Creek traveled was of <br />concern in terms of contaminants, or if things improved. Staff indicated it would follow-up in <br />writing. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested that the groundwater contamination coming from the contaminated soil at <br />the Baxter site could be alleviated by a shed roof. She asked if the City could negotiate with the <br />property owners or require that to happen, or work with the DEQ to ensure it happened. She <br />thought a shed roof was a simple, cost-effective remedy that would diminish the continuing <br />pollution. <br /> <br />C.Work Session: Selection of Bus Rapid Transit Routes for Further Study <br /> <br />Kurt Yeiter of the Planning and Development Department joined the council for the item. Lane <br />Transit District (LTD) Board member Gerry Gaydos, LTD General Manager Ken Hamm, and LTD <br />planners Stefano Viggiano and Graham Carey were also present for the item. Mr. Yeiter reminded <br />the council that it had asked LTD to identify the next routes in Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Staff had <br />consulted with the Planning Commission and asked it recommend three routes for further study, to <br />be narrowed to one route in the future. He emphasized that the process was not intended to <br />eliminate any routes from future consideration; all routes on the TransPlan map were valid, but <br />they could not all be completed at the same time. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter reviewed the Planning Commission's recommended routes: 1) West 11th/13th avenues <br />to Beltline Road; 2) Coburg Road to the Chad-Crescent area, with a possible link to a BRT line <br />connecting downtown Springfield to the Gateway area; and 3) West 6th/7th/Highway 99 to Barger <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 12, 2001 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />