Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Meisner determined from Mr. Johnson that staff had not yet decided if the downtown fire <br />station should be on land not owned by the City because its location was unknown. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he was troubled by the market rent issue and was not prepared to authorize that at <br />this time. He said that he understood that for fiscal year 2002 the City could dedicate the marginal <br />tax, but he needed to hear more about what happened in the out-years, and what dollar amounts <br />were being taken from General Fund and non-General Fund services, and what service implications <br />that had. Mr. Johnson said that staff was committed to returning with that information prior to <br />Supplemental Budget # 1. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he could not support a general obligation bond without a "road map" of the various <br />other funding initiatives that might be necessary in the future. Mr. Carlson indicated that a multi- <br />year financial plan was coming to the council for review in the fall. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ summarized the market rent approach as a means of enforced savings to establish a <br />sinking fund for construction. Mr. Johnson concurred. Mr. Pap~ was unsure of the mechanism <br />and thought more information was needed. However, he thought the City needed more discipline <br />in addressing its infrastructure needs, and applauded the staff for its creative thinking and asked <br />that it continue to work on the issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ wanted more information about the potential of consolidation with other police agencies. <br />Mr. Johnson noted that the City had committed, through the Public Safety Coordinating Council, <br />to a regional discussion of police special operations. Mr. Carlson indicated other services were <br />also involved in the discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor said he would oppose the motion not because he did not support safe facilities for staff <br />but because he was interested in a more comprehensive, wide-ranging discussion. He said that <br />staff had addressed the issue of remodeling existing buildings in a memorandum that indicated the <br />costs were about half the cost of new construction, but then the memorandum discussed why the <br />space was not desirable. He thought there was a basic lack of understanding on the part of staff <br />regarding the concepts of reuse and rebuild. Mr. Rayor called for a longer meeting on the subject. <br />He did not think he would get what he wanted in a work session. He thought the Sears building <br />might be a perfectly viable building, did not think the staff was willing to consider its use. Mr. <br />Rayor wanted the Police Special Operations out of the basement of City Hall, but would oppose <br />the motion until he could develop a better overall plan for proceeding. Mr. Johnson said that Mr. <br />Rayor had made some good points, but suggested that his reasons were not relevant to the motion <br />on the floor. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 6:2; Ms. Taylor and Mr. Rayor voting no. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 19, 2001 Page 11 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />