My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 11-25-19 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
11-25-19
>
Agenda Packet 11-25-19 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2019 10:46:58 AM
Creation date
11/15/2019 10:44:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Meeting
City_Council_Meeting_Date
11/25/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
11/25/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES – Eugene City Council Work Session October 30, 2019 Page 2 <br />2.WORK SESSION: Town Square Project UpdateUrban Development Manager Will Dowdy, Matt Koehler from Cameron McCarthy, and FrancescaGambetti from Shiels Obletz Johnsen talked about the town square concept design, the communityvision, and the options for next steps. <br />Mayor adjourned the meeting of the Eugene City Council and convened a meeting of the Eugene Urban <br />Renewal Agency.Council Discussion: <br />•Mayor Vinis – said she enjoyed the video and it was nice to see what the space would look like. <br />•Councilor Zelenka – said he really likes the design, concept, and public involvement that hasoccurred around this project; said he likes that the Saturday Market would have space designedspecifically for the market and that it’s critical the construction gets done during the off-season;asked what would happen with the salmon sculpture from the current fountain and if that couldget incorporated into the new design; asked if the eastern portion of the market was included inthe plan and budget as well. <br />•Councilor Syrett – said she participated in outreach events and that with the excellent publicoutreach received she feels confident that the design reflects input from the pubic as well as thefarmers market and Saturday market boards; said she appreciates many of the project detailsincluding taking out curbs and other accessibility components; said she likes opening the spaceand removing the walls, the improved stage, the fountain concept, the lighting, and keeping thetrees; said she’s ready to approve the recommended motion to advance this design forward. <br />•Councilor Semple – said she also appreciates the great public involvement and hopes it’s amodel for the future; said she appreciates that the farmers and Saturday markets won’t getdisplaced if construction is done during the off-season; said the one critical thing that’s missingis a restroom in the park blocks; said she likes that the trees are being kept, but it feels likethere’s a lot of concrete versus lawn and she’d like to see more lawn; said the proposed pavilionlooks as big as city hall and wonders how that matches up with priorities; voiced concernsabout paying for this project and wondered about phasing the features of the project. <br />•Councilor Yeh – asked how much funding has been identified for this project right now; askedwhat it would mean if council approved the design now in terms of looking at funding later. <br />•Councilor Taylor – asked at what point a contractor is pursued, before or after a public hearing;said she’d prefer to wait until after a public hearing to hire a contractor; said we needrestrooms, places for people to sit including moveable chairs and tables; said she’s not surethere has been enough broad participation; asked why removal of the current fountain is beingproposed; asked how the City can attract money for the project; shared objections to urbanrenewal money because it’s too easy to spend. <br />•Mayor Vinis – clarified that what she’s hearing from staff is that design information would cometo council incrementally and become increasingly specific along the way. <br />•Councilor Pryor – talked about the choice between fast, cheap, and right and said this projectultimately needs to be right; said he’s willing to negotiate around the timeline and the money;said in thinking about the next design steps, it’s a good investment to spend a reasonableamount of money on a contractor now so they’re with us in next steps; said he’s ready to moveto the next step of the thinking and designing process. <br />•Councilor Zelenka – said phasing is an interesting concept, but it costs more and it’s never goingto be cheaper later; said keeping and adding more trees is an important part of the project;shared concerns about integrating the new city hall into the town square plan and asked howthat will work; said that having 10,000 participants weigh-in so far is enough for him to want tomove forward with this project. <br />November 25, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.