My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 12-9-19 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2019
>
12-09-19
>
Agenda Packet 12-9-19 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 10:59:32 AM
Creation date
12/3/2019 10:52:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Meeting
City_Council_Meeting_Date
12/9/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
12/9/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON <br />Notes to Basic Financial Statements <br />continued <br />(5) Other Information, continued <br />(C) Retirement Plan – Oregon PERS (OPERS), continued <br />Depletion Date Projection <br />GASB 68 generally requires that a blended discount rate be used to measure the Total Pension Liability (the Actuarial <br />Accrued Liability calculated using the Individual Entry Age Normal Cost Method). The long-term expected return on <br />plan investments may be used to discount liabilities to the extent that the plan’s Fiduciary Net Position is projected to <br />cover benefit payments and administrative expenses. A 20-year high quality (AA/Aa or higher) municipal bond rate <br />must be used for periods where the Fiduciary Net Position is not projected to cover benefit payments and <br />administrative expenses. Determining the discount rate under GASB 68 will often require that the actuary perform <br />complex projections of future benefit payments and pension plan investments. GASB 68 (paragraph 67) does allow <br />for alternative evaluations of projected solvency, if such evaluation can reliably be made. GASB does not contemplate <br />a specific method for making an alternative evaluation of sufficiency; it is left to professional judgment. <br />The following circumstances justify an alternative evaluation of sufficiency for PERS: <br />PERS has a formal written policy to calculate an Actuarially Determined Contribution (ADC), which is articulated <br />in the actuarial valuation report. <br />The ADC is based on a closed, layered amortization period, which means that payment of the full ADC each year <br />will bring the plan to a 100% funded position by the end of the amortization period if future experience follows <br />assumption. <br />GASB 68 specifies that the projections regarding future solvency assume that plan assets earn the assumed rate <br />of return and there are no future changes in the plan provisions or actuarial methods and assumptions, which <br />means that the projections would not reflect any adverse future experience which might impact the plan’s funded <br />position. <br />Based on these circumstances, it is our independent actuary’s opinion that the detailed depletion date projections <br />outlined in GASB 68 would clearly indicate that the Fiduciary Net Position is always projected to be sufficient to cover <br />benefit payments and administrative expenses. <br />Sensitivity of the City's proportionate share of the net pension asset (liability) to changes in the discount rate <br />The following presents the City's proportionate share of the net pension asset (liability) calculated using the discount <br />rate of 7.2%, as well as what the City's proportionate share of the net pension asset (liability) would be if it were <br />calculated using a discount rate that is 1 percentage-point lower (6.2%) or 1 percentage-point higher (8.2%) than the <br />current rate: <br />Current <br />1% decrease discount rate 1% increase <br />(6.2%) (7.2%) (8.2%) <br />City’s proportionate share of the net <br /> pension asset (liability) $ (333,948,154) (199,826,692) (89,120,402) <br />Pension plan fiduciary net position <br />Detailed information about the pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued OPERS <br />financial report <br />Changes in Assumptions and Other inputs <br />Changes in actuarial methods and assumptions implemented since the December 31, 2016 valuation are described in <br />the 2016 Experience Study (Study), published September 2017. <br />Changes in assumptions from that Study are reported in the table of actuarial methods and assumptions on page 71. <br />Modifications to the allocation of actuarial accrued liabilities, administrative expense assumptions, healthcare cost <br />inflation, and mortality tables can be found in the Study at: http://www.oregon.gov/PERS/Pages/Financials/Actuarial- <br />Presentations-and-Reports.aspx. <br />71 <br />December 9, 2019, Meeting - Item 2CCC Agenda - Page 115
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.