My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 12/10/01 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2001
>
CC Minutes - 12/10/01 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:33:03 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 1:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
follow existing streets and roads between the two areas. The second would follow an existing <br />BPA power/ine easement and some existing roads. The final determination for the route would be <br />made when the project is scheduled. The fine is needed to accommodate planned electrical <br />growth in the next twenty years within the existing EWEB electrical service area. <br /> <br />You asked for clarification of the intent of the following new policy: Council Packet page 262, New <br />policy 2. "The UGB shall lie along the outside edge of existing and planned rights-of-way that <br />form a portion of the UGB so that the furl right-of-way is within the UGB." At the present time, the <br />existing approved urban growth boundary (UGB) foflows roads in some cases. In these <br />situations, the question has come up whether the UGB is located on the inside or outside of the <br />road right-of-way and either includes afl of the road, a portion, or none of it. This policy was <br />included in the draft Public Facility Plan to provide certainty to this situation. This policy cannot be <br />used to expand the UGB by adding a new street outside the UGB and using this policy to move <br />the boundary to the outside edge of a new street or road. It only applies to instances where the <br />existing UGB is located on a road. In those cases, the UGB would foflow the policy and be <br />located at the outside edge of the planned right-of-way or existing right-of-way, whichever is <br />greater. I hope this answers your questions. Please give me a carl if you need any additional <br />clarification. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson asked the council to consider Council Bill 4777 by number only. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved that the bill be <br /> approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; the motion passed <br /> unanimously, and became Ordinance No. 20240.. <br /> <br />XI.ACTION: An Ordinance Granting to the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad a Non- <br /> exclusive Franchise to Use the Public Way to Construct and Maintain Private <br /> Commercial Facilities Within the City of Eugene <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson asked the council to consider Council Bill 4778, an ordinance granting to <br />the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad a non-exclusive franchise to use the public way to <br />construct and maintain private commercial facilities within the City of Eugene. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved that the bill, with <br /> unanimous consent of the council, be read a second time by council bill <br /> number only, and that enactment be considered at that time. Roll call vote; <br /> the motion passed unanimously, and became Ordinance No. 2041. <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson asked the council to consider Council Bill 4778 by number only. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved that the bill be <br /> approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; the motion passed <br /> unanimously. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 10, 2001 Page 14 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.