Laserfiche WebLink
neighborhood associations. Mr. Kelly clarified he was referring to an elected group that included a finite, but <br />not fixed, number of individuals. <br /> <br /> The amendment to the motion passed, 6:1; Mr. Kelly voting no. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor, Richie Weinman of Planning and Development <br />Department confirmed that neighborhood clean-ups sponsored by the neighborhood would be <br />considered a general meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee observed that, given his ward representation, he should oppose all the recommendations <br />because they meant the West University Neighborhood Association would not qualify as <br />"active"and would continually be in "intervention mode." He believed the uniqueness of that <br />organization's situation as the neighborhood association in an area dominated by students <br />should be recognized. However, he believed the intent of the recommendations was to raise <br />standards for the program and for that reason was in support of the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr emphasized the importance of leadership training for the neighborhood organizations. <br />He said that the program must be marketed to residents to encourage participation, and he <br />would interested to see how the City incorporated marketing into the program. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson asked if any neighborhood association had met informally or otherwise with a <br />school site council to discuss issues of mutual concern. Mr. Weinman said that neighborhood <br />associations frequently met in schools and publicized meetings through school newsletters, but <br />he was unaware of any formal process for such joint meetings, or of any actual meetings <br />between site councils and neighborhood associations. He suggested that synergy might be <br />achieved through the Matching Grants Program, because site councils could be applicants for <br />grants to underwrite projects on school property. Ms. Nathanson said that would be great, and <br />she hoped it occurred. She encouraged the neighborhood associations to initiate such meetings <br />with site councils and other organizations in their areas. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said he received many calls from youth and their parents about youth activities in <br />north Eugene, and many of those calls originated with those living outside the city. He <br />suggested it would be helpful if the River Road/Santa Clara Neighborhood Organization reached <br />out to north Eugene schools. <br /> <br /> The main motion passed, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee moved, seconded by Ms. Taylor, to direct the City Manager to <br /> implement the suggested definition of neighborhood boundaries. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said that one of the boundary standards was that an association should not be <br />divided by a major natural or manmade barrier, such as the river and limited access arterials. He <br />said that <br />Whiteaker was divided by 1-105, and asked if there were other neighborhoods divided by a similar <br />barrier. Mr. Weinman responded that the Active Bethel Citizens association was divided by <br />Beltline, and the Harlow Neighbors association was divided by 1-105 and Beltline. Mr. Meisner <br />questioned whether the City would want to divide those associations on the basis of those <br />standards, or except existing neighborhood associations from the standard. Ms. Bridges stated <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 23, 2000 Page 5 <br />Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />