My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 04/10/00 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2000
>
CC Minutes - 04/10/00 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:27:36 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 2:38:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
firm's review indicated that at this point there were not a sufficient number of sufficiently <br />congested corridors in the community to warrant the implementation of congestion pricing. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee wondered at what point the community "drew the line," and implemented congestion <br />pricing to prevent congestion. Mr. Schwetz said that the consultant or staff were not suggesting <br />that the City should wait until congestion was bad to implement congestion pricing, but that <br />congestion was an indicator of demand. The community could begin looking at the strategy in its <br />planning cycles and determine where congestion pricing might have an effect in the future. <br /> <br />The council moved on to discussion of TDM Policy 3, Implement TDM strategies to manage <br />demand at congested locations. Mr. Schwetz noted the receipt of comments calling for the <br />promotion of alternative modes to reduce demand on the system and reduced use of the <br />automobile. Staff had analyzed the suitability of TDM strategies in selected congested areas, <br />and determined that the more mandatory a strategy, the more effective. Voluntary TDM can also <br />have an effect on congestion, with the benefit of postponing the need for expensive capital <br />projects, and creating situations where other TDM strategies can be more effective. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that the policy was not objectionable but it had no teeth. He suggested that it could <br />be given teeth by benchmarks that might trigger the implementation of mandatory TDM and by <br />funding. He had been surprised by the number of programs already operated by Lane Transit <br />District (LTD) of which he and most residents were unaware. Mr. Kelly said those programs <br />should be marketed to employers and to residents. Noting that most TDM efforts were financed <br />through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) process, Mr. Kelly called for a <br />policy that stated the adopting jurisdictions would work through the Metropolitan Policy <br />Committee (MPC) to increase TDM funding at the State level. He acknowledged that the MPC <br />would be required to move TDM ahead of some of the traditional road construction projects now <br />included in the STIP. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson noted that the list of congested areas studied by staff in connection with the <br />application of TDM strategies were specific locations, with the exception of West 18th Avenue. <br />She questioned whether a specific segment of the road was studied. Ms. Nathanson said that <br />the area was less served by public transit than other areas, and next year the situation would <br />worsen because routes were being deleted. It was difficult for those who live in the hills south of <br />18th Avenue to commute using alternate modes. She was unsure what TDM could do to address <br />the fact that in some places, people had fewer choices than in other areas. Ms. Childs <br />responded that the problems residents faced in terms of mode choice were not necessarily the <br />same communitywide, and the solutions to address them were not the same. She noted that <br />LTD planned to institute shuttle service into the neighborhoods in conjunction with Bus Rapid <br />Transit, which she termed a different kind of service. While service along West 18th Avenue itself <br />may not improve, service through the neighborhoods getting residents to the locations where <br />transit was provided may improve. Mr. Schwetz added that analysis of West 18th Avenue <br />involved the segment between Pearl and Polk streets, and the analysis indicated that much of <br />the rider ship demand was created by residents coming from the hills south of the road. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner concurred with Mr. Kelly's remarks regarding the prioritization of TDM through the <br />STIP. He said the staff response to testimony regarding Policy 3 needed to be read in the <br />context of the related responses to Policy 1. He emphasized that the council did not elect to <br />preclude mandatory TDM, and he read Policy 3 in the context of that decision. Mr. Meisner <br />hoped staff would provide progress reports on how the other adopting jurisdictions were treating <br />the issue. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 10, 2000 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.