My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 04/10/00 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2000
>
CC Minutes - 04/10/00 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:27:36 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 2:39:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
She called for information from staff on how the proposed ordinance relates to the Eugene <br />Wetlands Plan. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly thanked staff for their work on the proposed ordinance. He was in favor of taking <br />action, recognizing that it would be an interim strategy. He said that his first desire was to do no <br />harm to the remaining waterways and see how protection would work into the broader context of <br />Goal 5. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly noted that exemption decisions by the City Manager were appealable. <br /> <br />He called for information from staff regarding additional language in the ordinance on mitigation. <br /> <br />He announced that he would move to delete the exceptions in Section 6.660 la. and commented <br />that the completeness of an application before a certain date was not an appropriate reason for <br />granting an exception. He expressed a desire for staff to work with applicants to help them fit the <br />new criteria rather than granting an exception. <br /> <br />He called for stronger language in the ordinance on penalties for violators. <br /> <br />Regarding buffers, Councilor Kelly said that Goal 5 would address the issue but called for staff to <br />research interim buffering. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap8 raised concern over an accurate definition of an open waterway. He also raised <br />concern over the lack of a time limit on interim measures and stressed the importance of setting <br />such a limit on the interim phase and completing the Goal 5 study. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor raised concern over any delays in passing the ordinance. She commented that <br />the Planning Commission had made some improvements but expressed a desire to strengthen <br />the ordinance language before passage. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Rayor regarding ordinance language requiring the <br />restoration of illegally impacted streams, City Attorney Glenn Klein said that in Section 6.665 there <br />was language that authorized abatement of unlawful actions and authorized the City Manager to <br />direct restorative measures. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey again stressed that no action would be taken on the item that evening. <br /> <br /> V. ACTION: AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING PUBLIC CONTRACTING REGULATIONS <br /> THAT AMENDS SECTIONS 2.1210, 2.1220, AND 2.1255 OF THE EUGENE CODE <br /> 1971 <br /> <br />City Manager Johnson asked the council to consider Council Bill 4728, an ordinance concerning <br />public contracting regulations and amending sections 2.1210, 2.1220, and 2.1255 of the Eugene <br />code 1971 <br /> <br /> Councilor Lee, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved that the bill, with unani- <br /> mous consent of the council, be read a second time by council bill number <br /> only, and that enactment be considered at that time. The motion passed <br /> unanimously. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 10, 2000 Page 7 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.