Laserfiche WebLink
Speedway. He noted that no other city in the state had done as much as Eugene in terms of <br />wetland protection and it sets a standard for other cities to follow. He reported that the <br />Eugene Speedway property was eliminated from the approval by DSL and the Corps of <br />Engineers a number of years ago because there was insufficient information to determine <br />whether or not a recommendation could be made for developing or protecting. He said the <br />only thing that was designated on the speedway property was a small area at the southeast <br />comer as a protected zone. He added the City parceled up the speedway property on areas <br />that had been previously plowed or mowed and where there was a presence of sensitive or rare <br />plants. He commented that the speedway property (135 acres) is more complex as there are <br />issues of surface drainage and habitat quality. He added that none of that information is part <br />of the public record, nor has the speedway owner been requested to provide that information. <br />He said it is premature to have the City put designations on such a big and complex site. He <br />requested the elected officials reject the ordinance and not approve the amendments related to <br />the speedway. He added the criteria being applied to the site could be widely interpreted, as <br />there is a criteria that relates to being hydrologically connected to other wetlands and <br />waterways. He stated the property needs to be evaluated in pieces and defining those pieces <br />would be more accurate and reliable. He requested the record be held open so additional <br />information could be provided. <br /> <br />Raymer Holtan, 5003 E. Mercer Way, Mercer Island, WA, representing the Eugene <br />Speedway, reported he has been involved with the property for three years. He stated he <br />couldn't support the staff report. He supported the efforts that are taking place and wants to <br />see the process brought to a conclusion. He said that staff is seeking to protect more property <br />than is appropriate or necessary for a desirable balance between preservation and <br />development. He said that staft~s proposal effectively denies access to 14 acres of <br />commercially zoned property of the speedway and creates a landlocked situation. He noted <br />that the effort to regulate protection of the site is far inferior to a cooperative effort. He added <br />to regulate protection will create issues and the ultimate resolution will take time and money <br />and put them in limbo. He said he has participated in meetings with staff and other members <br />of agencies and has proposed a means of ensuring a desirable corridor along Willowcreek, <br />involving a sale or gift of certain properties and the restoration of portions of the speedway <br />proper. He said they would be submitting a resolution of the problem that will satisfy all <br />interested parties. He stated they need more time and would appreciate the elected officials' <br />encouragement to appropriate parties to participate in a cooperative effort. He requested that <br />the designations proposed by staff not be presented as an ultimatum, as they are ready, willing <br />and able to participate in compromise discussions leading to a satisfactory conclusion. <br /> <br />Misha Seymour, 1313 Lincoln, #306, Eugene, stated that the wetlands need to be restored. <br />He said that Earth needs to be protected and every day should be Earth Day. He said Hyundai <br />should go home as they have not been a good neighbor. <br /> <br />Bern Johnson, 1290 E. 25th, Eugene, said he will be submitting written testimony. He said <br />he was in favor of the three ordinances. He asked the elected officials to apply the law to <br />Hyundai as to any other person or company in the community. He said Hyundai came to the <br />West Eugene Wetlands Plan in 1995 and applied to build three factories. He said they applied <br />to the agencies for a permit to build the phase three factory. He said those agencies turned <br />them down. He added that in 1995, as they were building the first factory, they had already <br />been refused permission to build in the wetlands. He quoted from the Division of State Lands <br />in its official findings of fact. He said the Corps of Engineers (in their official permit <br /> <br /> <br />