My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 1-13-20 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2020
>
1-13-20
>
Agenda Packet 1-13-20 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2020 5:47:41 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 5:46:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
1/13/2020
City_Council_Effective_Date
1/13/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
If a position the IGR Committee has taken on a bill is not unanimous, the position on that bill will be neutral until the full City Council weighs in and directs a position. The bill will then be placed on the next available City Council agenda. Although any bill that has been reviewed by the IGR Committee may be pulled for discussion at the request of any councilor or the Mayor at the City Council meeting, as a matter of practice and courtesy to the members of the Council who do not sit on the IGR Committee, any bill on which the IGR Committee is not in unanimous agreement will be specifically noted. The City Council can modify the position taken by the IGR Committee on a bill; the final direction to staff on any bill comes from the City Council. 12.Process for Federal Lobbying EffortsThe IGR Committee and IGR staff address Federal lobbying priorities in concert with anumber of the City’s local governmental partners.The Federal priorities begin with a review of opportunities for funding in the next Federal budget and goals that are specific to Eugene or the area. The IGR Committee meets and reviews the list of potential priority projects. Potential projects should be those projects which have already gone through the proper authorization channels and are “shovel ready” projects. Once the IGR Committee reviews the list of potential projects, the Committee develops a list of project goals that are considered to be achievable. After the proposed goals have been vetted by staff, United Front partners, and other community partners, and the IGR Committee, the priorities list is then presented to the full City Council for review and approval. The final list becomes part of the “United Front” agenda which is presented to the area’s congressional representatives, executive department staff, and other potential funding sources in Washington, D.C. The attendees on the lobbying trips typically include the Mayor, chair of the IGR Committee, and appropriate City staff. 13.Grants and Funding ApplicationsThe IGR Committee acts on staff recommendations for grant and other funding applicationsfrom outside agencies such as governmental or private entities. This process is intended tohelp avoid situations in which City departments may inadvertently be competing with eachother for funding, and to allow the IGR Committee and City Council to review staff plans forexpenditures of grant funds.City staff interested in seeking funding prepares a written overview of the funding application for review by the IGR Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. If timing is critical and there is no IGR Committee meeting scheduled, the Committee may give its approval via e-mail. IGR staff will keep full and complete records of the documents related to the request for funding, the electronic notification of the request to review and the disposition of the request. <br />January 13, 2019, Work Session – Item 2Page 22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.