Laserfiche WebLink
turned down an offer to speak to any private citizen on any topic or to speak to any public <br />employee on any topic. He expressed his hope that what would come out of the situation would <br />be constructive work with the union and with police management and mayor and council. He <br />expressed his gratitude to the mayor and the council for their support. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner said that he had been contacted at home from the media regarding his opinion <br />of the police union lawsuit. He said that was the first he had heard of it and promptly called <br />Councilor Kelly to discuss the matter. He said that he was delighted to find that the notice of <br />intent had been withdrawn and that discussions would proceed. He stated that all of the <br />councilors had taken the job expecting the opportunity and responsibility to speak their minds on <br />policy issues. He added that threat of a lawsuit by the police union was only one form of <br />intimidation that councilors faced and called for the public to condemn all forms of intimidation as <br />roundly and soundly as they had for Councilor Kelly that evening. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner reiterated Councilor Kelly's concerns over LUCU. He added that the City was <br />losing ground to bad development and said that the council could not selectively reopen the <br />record for land use. He agreed that more time was needed for the process but raised concern <br />that if the council delayed the work session to wait for recommendation from citizen groups then <br />the record would have to be reopened for all citizens. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey stressed that councilors needed to notify staff if they wanted to grant, or not grant, <br />the request to delay the work session. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said that the first time he heard of the lawsuit was the Sunday evening the day <br />before their press conference. He said that when he heard what the police union was proposing <br />to sue about, he urged them to reconsider their action. <br /> <br />III.CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br /> Councilor Lee, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to approve the items on <br /> the consent calendar. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly offered a correction to the work session minutes of July 7, 2000, page one. He <br />wanted to replace "...the event had been peaceful as a result..." with "...the dialog may have <br />helped keep the event peaceful..." <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br />IV. PUBLIC HEARING: An ordinance concerning Prostitution-Free Zones, and Adding <br /> Sections 4.746, 4.747, 4.748, 4.749, and 4.750 to the Eugene Code 1971; and an <br /> Ordinance Concerning Traffic Congestion Thoroughfares, and Amending Section <br /> 5.155 of the Eugene Code 1971; and an Ordinance Concerning the Penalty for <br /> Committing the Crime of Prostitution and Amending Section 4.990 of the Eugene <br /> Code 1971 <br /> <br />City Manager Jim Johnson noted that one hearing would be held for all three ordinances but that <br />they needed to be adopted as three separate ordinances when the council took action. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 10, 2000 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />