Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Pap~ said that he appreciated the work done by staff, police and citizens. He said that <br />he would support the ordinance because of the testimony of citizens who said that their children <br />had been harassed. He said that the ordinance was the best step that could be taken <br />immediately. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor opposed the prostitution-free zones and commented that if something was illegal <br />it should be illegal everywhere. <br /> <br />Regarding exclusions, Councilor Taylor said that it was a penalty before conviction and added that <br />the problem would not go away just because someone was banned from a neighborhood. She <br />said that the people had to still exist somewhere else. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor said that she would consider voting for a cruising ordinance for the entire city. <br />She commented that if no one was cruising there would be less street business. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson supported the ordinance. She commented that it was a quality of life issue <br />and that the city had a responsibility to manage the quality of life for the majority of residents. <br />She raised concern over trampling the rights of individuals and going beyond the law, but stressed <br />the importance of doing everything possible to maintain quality of life. <br /> <br />Councilor Rayor said that he took the plight of drug-addicted prostitutes very seriously. He <br />supported the idea of going to the Human Services Commission to get more money for the ACES <br />drug treatment program. He expressed a desire for the ordinance to be more harsh toward johns. <br />He thanked those involved for their work on the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner supported the ordinances as they were presented. He said his support was not <br />conditional upon more drug court funding, although he would like to see that happen. He said that <br />he lived in the neighborhood in question and had seen solicitation by prostitutes. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner commented that prostitution was not a victimless crime. He noted that the <br />problem was located in a residential neighborhood, and urged citizens to walk that neighborhood <br />so that they could better understand the problem. He said that if quality of life was not guaranteed <br />to the central neighborhoods of the city the council would have failed and the inner city <br />neighborhoods would fail. <br /> <br />Councilor Lee said he would support the ordinances if he had a clear picture of the social service <br />side of the equation. He said that his support would come when he could identify a sense of <br />balance in how the social problem was being dealt with. He said that he had gone door to door in <br />the neighborhood to get citizen input. He stressed that children were being harassed in the <br />neighborhood and said that he would support ordinances as long as all the pieces were in place. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said that it was important for citizens to remember that the people looking for <br />prostitutes came from all over the city. He said that the ordinance was not casting aspersions at <br />the people who lived in the area, but trying to do something to improve the environment of the <br />area. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey acknowledged that there were social ills that caused prostitution but emphasized <br />that those ills were not an excuse. He said that he was prepared to support all of the ordinances. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 10, 2000 Page 7 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />