My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 08/07/00 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2000
>
CC Minutes - 08/07/00 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:30:58 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 2:44:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to do much of the staff work but that it would still have an impact on staff time. Ms. Childs added <br />that the public involvement process would be the primary user of City staff time. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to not pursue interim setbacks and <br /> rely on existing PUD provisions and LUCU until the Natural Resources Study <br /> was complete. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said that seconded the motion in her role as Council Vice President but would vote <br />against it. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly did not see the need to examine each of the lots in question. He pointed out that a flyer <br />was circulated for the LUCU and suggested the same process for interim buffers. He noted that <br />raising land use application fees could be used to cover a portion of the costs involved. <br /> <br />Ms. Childs said that individual properties needed to be examined because they would be rezoned <br />so the waterside protection provisions could be applied. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that existing PUD provisions and LUCU were not "good enough." He commented <br />that interim buffers may not be the best solution but they were certainly better than doing nothing. <br />He stressed that a degraded waterway could not be remade. <br /> <br />Mr. Fart was in favor of the motion. He commented that there were 585 tax lots that would be <br />affected by interim buffers and that was a significant percentage of the City's buildable land. He <br />raised concern that the amount of available housing would be affected. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner reiterated Mr. Kelly's concerns. He said that LUCU would not be completed in a <br />timely fashion and he did not think the PUD provisions provided enough protection. <br /> <br /> The motion failed, 6:2, with Mr. Fart and Mr. Pap~ voting in favor. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to direct staff to proceed with <br /> interim setbacks as outlined in the scope of work of June 21, 2000, and to <br /> approve a request for $85,000 that will be processed as part of Supplemental <br /> Budget #1. If the interim setback ordinance is challenged, there will be <br /> additional legal fees (for defending that challenge) that are not included in the <br /> $85,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly offered a friendly amendment, which was accepted, to change the wording of the <br />motion to read "up to $85,000" in light of the money-saving measures that were discussed. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 6:2, with Mr. Farr and Mr. Pap~ voting in opposition. <br /> <br />E.WORK SESSION AND ACTION: Charge to Proposed Citizen Charter Review Committee <br /> and Appointment Process for the Proposed Committee <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly, seconded by Mr. Lee, moved to create a nine-member citizen <br /> committee to undertake a review of the Eugene City Charter specifically <br /> concerning the following as identified by members of the council: <br /> <br /> A. Chapter III, Sections 5, 6, and 8 (wards and elections by wards) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 7, 2000 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.