Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Pap~ returned to the meeting. <br /> <br />VI.ACTION: An Ordinance Concerning Prostitution-Free Zones, and Adding Sections 4.746, <br /> 4.747, 4.748, 4.749 and 4.750 to the Eugene Code, 1971; and an Ordinance <br /> Concerning Traffic Congestion Thoroughfares, and Amending Section 5.155 of the <br /> Eugene Code, 1971; and an Ordinance Concerning the Penalty for Committing the <br /> Crime of Prostitution and Amending Section 4.990 of the Eugene Code, 1971 <br /> <br />Councilor Lee raised concern that there was not enough capacity in the system to address the <br />problem of drug addiction in prostitutes as an issue. He commented that the goal of the <br />ordinances was not just to change public behavior but to help prostitutes to get off the cycle of <br />drugs. <br /> <br /> Councilor Lee, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved that the council commit <br /> to funding approximately $50,000 in additional drug treatment opportunities <br /> for prostitutes using grant funds or other funds. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mayor Torrey regarding whether the motion was conditioned on the <br />passage of the prostitution ordinance, Councilor Lee, with the agreement of his second, said that <br />it was. <br /> <br />Councilor Lee stressed the importance of having capacity within the system to ensure that drug <br />intervention for prostitutes was possible. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said that there was no question that the residents in the affected area had a <br />serious problem. He stressed that the council needed to do what was appropriate to keep those <br />residents safe from harassment by prostitutes and "johns." He also stressed the importance of <br />addressing the underlying issues of the prostitution problem as well. He said that it was important <br />to have council, on record, with a commitment to addressing the underlying issues. He suggested <br />having the council representative to the Human Services Commission stress the council's desire <br />to have funding to address those issues. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner raised concern that the motion was sacrificing a solution to address the <br />problems of those committing the crimes. He reiterated Councilor Kelly's comments regarding the <br />funding priorities of the Human Services Commission. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap8 commented that there were many social problems in the community. He raised <br />concern over how the funds would be provided for addressing drug addiction in prostitutes. He <br />said that he would not support the motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson said that she would support the ordinance "with no strings attached." She <br />noted that the ordinance was not ward-specific and that the problem could happen in any ward. <br />She stressed that the ordinance benefitted the city at large. <br />Councilor Kelly commented that it was part of the City's responsibility to try to change social <br />problems. He stressed the importance of addressing the underlying issues of prostitution. <br /> <br />Councilor Lee stressed the importance of prevention measures instead of punitive measures. He <br />said that changing public behavior took a multiple approach. He said the money would go to a <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 7, 2000 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />